Re: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile
Dan Frost <danfrost@cisco.com> Fri, 24 December 2010 15:36 UTC
Return-Path: <danfrost@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id EF94D3A657C for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.335,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hgCErvzeV98E for
<mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A4F3A67DA for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>;
Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com;
dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGNNFE1AZnwM/2dsb2JhbACkLnOkTJsuhUoEiwQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,223,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="196427369"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2010 15:38:47 +0000
Received: from isolaria.cisco.com (isolaria.cisco.com [64.100.19.13]) by
rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBOFclu3002047;
Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:38:47 GMT
Received: from isolaria.cisco.com (isolaria [127.0.0.1]) by isolaria.cisco.com
(8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBOFclJS008486; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:38:47 -0500
Received: (from danfrost@localhost) by isolaria.cisco.com
(8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id oBOFckGh008485; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:38:46 GMT
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:38:46 +0000
From: Dan Frost <danfrost@cisco.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20101224153846.GA8417@cisco.com>
References: <029601cba362$a9b22ce0$fd1686a0$@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <029601cba362$a9b22ce0$fd1686a0$@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile@tools.ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:36:46 -0000
Hi Adrian, On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:04:03PM +0000, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi authors, > > Thanks for this document showing how the generic MPLS loss and delay > measurement mechanisms can be applied to MPLS-TP. > > Can I suggest some modifications? > > [...] Thanks for the review and text! Version -01 addresses your comments. We may consolidate the parameter lists in a future version. Cheers, -d