IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls-tp] 答复: Re: Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)

wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn Fri, 10 December 2010 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434DD28C164; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:24:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -92.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1bB6w9Ey6rMe; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [63.218.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595BD28C158; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.34.0.130] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 35101105171106; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:24:23 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.19] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 55813.5433334646; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:26:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse2.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id oBA0PsQK037547; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:25:54 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A53264030CBC35@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFA4FEC52B.FF865E94-ON482577F5.00019D35-482577F5.00026E0F@zte.com.cn>
From: wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:23:15 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2010-12-10 08:25:48, Serialize complete at 2010-12-10 08:25:49, Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2010-12-10 08:25:49
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00026E0C482577F5_="
X-MAIL: mse2.zte.com.cn oBA0PsQK037547
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org, mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org, ext Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Subject: [mpls-tp] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUmU6ICBBbGFybSBSZXBvcnRpbmcgKGFrYSBB?= =?gb2312?b?SVMp?=
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:24:38 -0000

Huub,

I think we need to listen to the views of Neil on AIS.

This is just a purely technical discussion, isn't it?

Best regards,
steven





"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> 
发件人:  mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org
2010-12-09 22:54

收件人
"ext Huub van Helvoort" <huubatwork@gmail.com>om>, <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>
抄送
mpls-tp@ietf.org
主题
Re: [mpls-tp] Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)






Huub,
This kind of exchanges is very unpleasant....
We keep hearing Neil's approach on AIS in CO-PS for years..he clearly 
expressed it many times on the list....It is absolutely not a recent 
change...
I would also curious to understand what consensus means...does it mean 
that everyone agreed to the content, that there was no even one objection? 

Best regards,
Nurit

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
Of ext Huub van Helvoort
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:50 PM
To: neil.2.harrison@bt.com
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)

Hi Neil,

You replied:

> Do you know how old that Rec is?

Yes. And there is a more recent one that contains
similar text. So you must have changed your mind
very recently.

> Do you know that ITU  Recs are written by several
 > folks and represent a general view of all
 > particapting parties at that time?

They are approved by consensus.
And because Y.1710 concerns MPLS I would guess that
MPLS experts were present when it was consented.

> Do you not believe folks can change their minds in the
 > light of improved understanding/knowledge?...

Sure, but wouldn't it have been better to document
that change of mind.

Regards, Huub.



-- 
*****************************************************************
                          我爱外点一七三一
_______________________________________________
mpls-tp mailing list
mpls-tp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
_______________________________________________
mpls-tp mailing list
mpls-tp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp




--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email