IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Thu, 09 December 2010 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B385328C117 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:53:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwnsJluj4yGL for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADA628C0F3 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oB9Esx6x003565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:54:59 +0100
Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (demuexc023.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oB9EsvY2027754; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:54:59 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.25]) by demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:54:56 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:54:56 +0100
Message-ID: <077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A53264030CBC35@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D00D065.6060800@gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)
Thread-Index: AcuXn5QZj/s/NLbxTk28MdAOQUAqnQADvO9A
References: <001d01cb977d$a3a1b0a0$eae511e0$%vissers@huawei.com> <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76D6B7A9427B@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com><6D3D47CB84BDE349BC23BF1C94E316E4400433C8C0@EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net><4D00B48D.20007@gmail.com><6D3D47CB84BDE349BC23BF1C94E316E4400433C93A@EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net><4D00BB17.5000400@gmail.com><6D3D47CB84BDE349BC23BF1C94E316E4400433C992@EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net><4D00C9B7.7070106@gmail.com><6D3D47CB84BDE349BC23BF1C94E316E4400433CA6C@EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> <4D00D065.6060800@gmail.com>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "ext Huub van Helvoort" <huubatwork@gmail.com>, <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2010 14:54:56.0690 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B6D2920:01CB97B1]
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:53:33 -0000

Huub,
This kind of exchanges is very unpleasant....
We keep hearing Neil's approach on AIS in CO-PS for years..he clearly expressed it many times on the list....It is absolutely not a recent change...
I would also curious to understand what consensus means...does it mean that everyone agreed to the content, that there was no even one objection? 
Best regards,
Nurit

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Huub van Helvoort
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:50 PM
To: neil.2.harrison@bt.com
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Alarm Reporting (aka AIS)

Hi Neil,

You replied:

> Do you know how old that Rec is?

Yes. And there is a more recent one that contains
similar text. So you must have changed your mind
very recently.

> Do you know that ITU  Recs are written by several
 > folks and represent a general view of all
 > particapting parties at that time?

They are approved by consensus.
And because Y.1710 concerns MPLS I would guess that
MPLS experts were present when it was consented.

> Do you not believe folks can change their minds in the
 > light of improved understanding/knowledge?...

Sure, but wouldn't it have been better to document
that change of mind.

Regards, Huub.



-- 
*****************************************************************
                          我爱外点一七三一
_______________________________________________
mpls-tp mailing list
mpls-tp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email