[mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031
Saravanan P <PSaravanan@ixiacom.com> Mon, 27 December 2010 05:12 UTC
Return-Path: <PSaravanan@ixiacom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 248773A684C for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:12:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mm8UIR8Sj1Ei for
<mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ixqw-mail-out.ixiacom.com (ixqw-mail-out.ixiacom.com
[66.77.12.12]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8E93A684F for
<mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ixcaexch07.ixiacom.com
([fe80:0000:0000:0000:e021:fcf5:238.143.231.20]) by ixqw-hc2.ixiacom.com
([10.210.5.16]) with mapi; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:14:48 -0800
From: Saravanan P <PSaravanan@ixiacom.com>
To: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:14:48 -0800
Thread-Topic: Linear Ether APS-g8031
Thread-Index: AculhAvxVm5iuHd2RbGsE97pUE+5aw==
Message-ID: <CFAB86E936BD6440B59B8FA25A792C060DF928DB9F@IXCAEXCH07.ixiacom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CFAB86E936BD6440B59B8FA25A792C060DF928DB9FIXCAEXCH07ixi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:12:46 -0000
Folks, I am implementing Ether APS channel functionality over pseudo wire/LSP and using BFD for CCM . As per my understanding Liner protection switching functionality shall be implemented by two standard IETF(draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection) and another one is I-TUT (g8031). CCM functionality would be either y.1731 or BFD but EtherAps should be g8031 or IETF. Is this combination work in field and any one foresee interoperability issue? I don't see anywhere in requirement document for g8031 as an APS option on LSP/PW Regards, Saravanan. www.ixiacom.com<http://www.ixiacom.com>
- [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031 Saravanan P
- Re: [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031 Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031 Saravanan P
- Re: [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031 Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031 Saravanan P
- Re: [mpls-tp] Linear Ether APS-g8031 Huub van Helvoort