Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

[Scott Mansfield <[e-mail]>]

Yes, Support

________________________________
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of George Swallow
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 3:54 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

Folks -

We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications.  In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two.
One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.

Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup documents as
draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.

This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup drafts.

A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.

A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.

The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC.

George and Loa