[mpls-tp] 答复: Question RE:draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-02

xia.liang2@zte.com.cn Thu, 01 July 2010 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <xia.liang2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA7C3A67A5; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -92.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0jH5G6VgunT; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EF93A67C3; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 552341570495873; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:13:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.19] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 2748.7349437453; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:13:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse2.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id o617B6oc039965; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:11:06 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from xia.liang2@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimX-ml464zkvOEjztTWIFVSDdNn0wi1FZVoRwD-@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFEEF3A03F.79F42228-ON48257753.0024F8D5-48257753.00277275@zte.com.cn>
From: xia.liang2@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:06:08 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 2010-07-01 15:10:55, Serialize complete at 2010-07-01 15:10:55
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0027727248257753_="
X-MAIL: mse2.zte.com.cn o617B6oc039965
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls-tp] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFF1ZXN0aW9uIFJFOmRyYWZ0LWZyb3N0LW1w?= =?gb2312?b?bHMtdHAtbG9zcy1kZWxheS0wMg==?=
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:13:31 -0000

Hi, Greg: 
  As far as I know, RFC5860(MPLS-TP OAM Requirements) clearly defines that 
LM and DM functions only need to support PWs, LSPs, Sections. 
  From my understanding, maybe the reason is because it's enough for these 
two performance measurement functions to be concerned on getting the end 
to end client service performance information, they don't care about the 
performance information of a part(Segments or SPME) of an end to end path.

                        Xia.Liang
                       Best regards




mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org 写于 2010-07-01 02:32:02:

> Dear Editors and All,
> the document states that DM and LM mechanisms described are 
> applicable to PW, LSPs (p2p bidirectional co-routed and associated 
> as well as p2p, p2mp unidirectional), and Sections. I didn't find 
> reference to Segments or SPME. Would described mechanisms apply to 
> SPME? Your clarification greatly appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg_______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp



--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.