IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-00

Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net> Tue, 17 August 2010 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nitinb@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210D53A68AC for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dYi96R5eJ1t for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161083A685C for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTGrr12SmiJaEuVn5+1GwYSSbIKdvYtuP@postini.com; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:06:49 PDT
Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:06:33 -0700
From: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
To: Mahesh Akula <mahesh.akula36@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:06:31 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-00
Thread-Index: Acs+RQj5mpM5Bjz2Tsy3IN6gdsaUjgAAqYKx
Message-ID: <C89039D7.16B0B%nitinb@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=r44gaKU4_yXzLMP45zQywVGGKR9e+o8af7skF@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-00
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:06:14 -0000

Will add relevant text.

On 8/17/10 12:47 PM, "Mahesh Akula" <mahesh.akula36@gmail.com> wrote:

[MA] Responding back with the requested reply mode may not be correct because while sending the packet, draft explicitly specifies that reply mode in the lsp ping request MUST be set to 4. If it is not, it means the request packet is malformed right? If it is suggested to drop the packet in such case,  I think text may be added in the draft stating this.

Thanks
Nitin

Thanks,
Mahesh

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email