Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn Tue, 21 December 2010 08:40 UTC
Return-Path: <wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17B03A69CA; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:40:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.422, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmCRKcDhEHjR; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [63.218.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A8A3A69B0; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.34.0.130] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 35101911657480; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:39:45 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.19] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 97021.2166155513; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:35:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse2.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id oBL8c2xG049445; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:38:03 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
To: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OF637C175A.4813828D-ON48257800.002F7948-48257800.002F7DB0@zte.com.cn>
From: wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:35:07 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2010-12-21 16:37:48, Serialize complete at 2010-12-21 16:37:48
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 002F7DAD48257800_="
X-MAIL: mse2.zte.com.cn oBL8c2xG049445
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:40:34 -0000
Yes/Support. Best regards, steven George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com> 发件人: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org 2010-12-16 04:53 收件人 <mpls@ietf.org>, <mpls-tp@ietf.org> 抄送 主题 [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Folks - We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications. In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two. One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup documents as draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup drafts. A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC. George and Loa _______________________________________________ mpls-tp mailing list mpls-tp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Elisa Bellagamba
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Scott Mansfield
- [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Luyuan Fang (lufang)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Agrahara Kiran Koushik
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts wei.hongbo
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… binny jeshan
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Vero Zheng
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… George Swallow