Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] Proposal of using GAL for PW

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Fri, 02 July 2010 09:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD273A67AE; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.943
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.655, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUI4yfsNItTS; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351F03A63EC; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.53,525,1272844800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="128053427"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2010 09:24:20 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o629OIeN023667; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:24:18 GMT
Received: from dhcp-gpk02-vlan300-64-103-65-3.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id o629OF612834; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:24:16 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4C2DB03F.7000709@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:24:15 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
References: <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6940E809263@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <C8529DB4.4489A%giles.heron@gmail.com> <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6940E80926C@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6940E80926C@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020809060501010709030708"
Cc: Andy Malis <amalis@gmail.com>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, "lihan@chinamobile.com" <lihan@chinamobile.com>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>, HUANG Feng F <Feng.f.Huang@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] Proposal of using GAL for PW
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:24:09 -0000

On 01/07/2010 19:35, Shahram Davari wrote:
>
> !mmm so if one used entropy then they can’t have OAM?
>
> -SD
>

Not so. The GAL goes above the entropy label (S=0), so gets parsed
first. This works for both PHP and not PHP, and both LSP and PW.

- Stewart