IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 15 December 2010 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A1D3A6D9A for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:22:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l8JafhgQsqle for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701E63A6D71 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcFAC5CCE1AZnwN/2dsb2JhbACDZJIVji1zpkSCTg4Bh2gIkHaBHYM1eASESIYz
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,348,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="193325963"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 12:24:29 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBFCOSQ1026500 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:24:28 GMT
Received: from dhcp-64-103-85-66.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id oBFCOQ826827; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:24:27 GMT
Message-ID: <4D08B37A.3060903@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:24:26 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls-tp@ietf.org
References: <575335.64858.qm@web15602.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <CF9E38FB-E55F-468C-9082-1F62E80A896F@asgaard.org> <4D0721EA.1030103@gmail.com> <0029E41E-2032-421C-B6AC-FCC5CF3D736E@cdl.asgaard.org> <4D0749B0.7070103@gmail.com> <AC13FBBA-B612-480F-BFE6-1D587FD308F0@niven-jenkins.co.uk> <19F0B4CE377654418760FE8A13EA7255055C9543FF@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <19F0B4CE377654418760FE8A13EA7255055C9543FF@EMV02-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:22:49 -0000

Yes, however some context is important.

At the time there was clear WG consensus that the drafts were
approximately right, and an expectation by all concerned that any
changes that resulted from WG deliberations would need to be reflected
in the implementations.

Stewart

On 15/12/2010 12:02, andy.bd.reid@bt.com wrote:
> I seem to remember that pseudo wires were widely implemented as a "de facto" standard while still an internet draft. And this was the case for a considerable length of time.
>
> Andy

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email