Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
Vero Zheng <verozheng@huawei.com> Wed, 22 December 2010 02:45 UTC
Return-Path: <verozheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368753A68EA; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFi0YfAISYuQ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD093A692B; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LDT00BPZ6ERIE@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:47:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z50128 ([10.110.98.157]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LDT002DP6ERVW@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:47:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:47:15 +0800
From: Vero Zheng <verozheng@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
To: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Message-id: <5CB327C820AC48AFBC2CE797DDE5E1B7@z50128>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_pL0rLp/Bjylvdbw0elBgpg)"
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:45:30 -0000
One week poll on Loss / Delay draftsYes/Support BR, Vero From: George Swallow Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:53 AM To: mpls@ietf.org ; mpls-tp@ietf.org Subject: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Folks - We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications. In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two. One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup documents as draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup drafts. A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC. George and Loa -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ mpls-tp mailing list mpls-tp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Elisa Bellagamba
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Scott Mansfield
- [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Luyuan Fang (lufang)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Agrahara Kiran Koushik
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts wei.hongbo
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… binny jeshan
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Vero Zheng
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… George Swallow