Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
<neil.2.harrison@bt.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B9E4D3A695E; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:58:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GR9xPM9Etqpe;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:58:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpe1.intersmtp.com (smtp61.intersmtp.COM [62.239.224.234]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3664F28C0CE;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:58:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EVMHT63-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.100) by
RDW083A005ED61.smtp-e1.hygiene.service (10.187.98.10) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:59:26 +0000
Received: from EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([169.254.2.123]) by
EVMHT63-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([10.36.3.100]) with mapi;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:59:28 +0000
From: <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>
To: <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>, <jdrake@juniper.net>,
<lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com>, <rajiva@cisco.com>, <yljiang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:56:46 +0000
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: [mpls-tp]
pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcuSIsOuufii+EmrRR6zdRegAAiNTAAAEK3wAADnxZAAAeA2YAAAlddg
Message-ID: <6D3D47CB84BDE349BC23BF1C94E316E44003A8B52D@EMV62-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <4CE51469.2020105@pi.nu><00c201cb9137$0e7b1fd0$6428460a@china.huawei.com><5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C53F6CF1@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net><077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A532640301C477@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net><5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C53F6D0C@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net><006701cb91be$e5b529a0$6428460a@china.huawei.com><2CCE3984-04BC-4A59-B2EF-F0D2BBACB594@cisco.com><E6E66922099CFB4391FAA7A7D3238F9F20AF8DB7@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
<5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C549DDBE@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
<40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A004F7B009@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
In-Reply-To: <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A004F7B009@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int, pwe3@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3]
[mpls] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:58:14 -0000
In-line please. > -----Original Message----- > From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Manuel.Paul@telekom.de > Sent: 02 December 2010 14:46 > To: jdrake@juniper.net; lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com; > rajiva@cisco.com; yljiang@huawei.com > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int; pwe3@ietf.org; > mpls-tp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: [mpls-tp] > pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > John, > > I am concerned that this discussion is fuelled by some > misunderstandings. > > No matter what OAM is used in the packet transport layer > ("server layer" if you want), we cannot expect that to be > present in the client layer. NH=> So what? The client layer MUST be independent of the server in all respects...not just DP OAM. > > Of course, in case the client layer is MPLS-TP too, all the > fancy OAM (e.g. CC/CV/RDI) NH=> 'Fancy OAM'...good heavens...CV+RDI are the absolute minimum....and we should keep the defect detection OAM as simple/sparse as possible). Unnecessary (or 'fancy' if you prefer) OAM are things like AIS in co-ps and TCM stuff. regards, Neil could be in use there as well (but > out of administrative control of the transport operator). > > Best Regards > Manuel > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] > On Behalf > > Of John E Drake > > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:45 PM > > To: LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN); RajivAsati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang > > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Sprecher,Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); > MPLS-TP ad > > hoc team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: [mpls-tp] > > pollondraft-he-mpls- tp-csf-03.txt > > > > That statement is incorrect. MPLS-TP uses BFD for CC/CV/RDI > > (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/) > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > > > Of LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN) > > > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:17 AM > > > To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang > > > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod > HaSharon); MPLS-TP > > > ad hoc team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] > pollondraft-he- > > > mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > provocative statement alert- We should as we are talking about > > > MPLS-TP and not about IP network layer. > > > > > > ./ > > > Lieven > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > > > Of Rajiv Asati (rajiva) > > > Sent: 02 December 2010 14:14 > > > To: Yuanlong Jiang > > > Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad hoc team; > > > mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] > pollondraft-he- > > > mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > Are we ignoring the existence of BFD altogether? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Rajiv > > > > > > Sent from my Phone > > > > > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Yuanlong Jiang > <yljiang@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > Typically, IP will only detect a failure in a time > scale of minutes. > > > > That is one reason why MPLS-TP OAM and Protection & Switching is > > > needed. > > > > I am not sure which mechanism in MPLS provides the CSF-like > > > capability, could you give more hints? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Yuanlong > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John E Drake" > > > <jdrake@juniper.net> > > > > To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" > > > <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>om>; "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>om>; > > > "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>nu>; <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; > > > <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:29 PM > > > > Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > > > ondraft-he-mpls- > > > tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > > > > > > > >> Nurit, > > > >> > > > >> As I understand the original requirement from Malcolm > Betts, this > > > capability is required for those cases in which a client > is unable > > > to detect the failure of its peer. In MPLS-TP, we have three > > > clients, PW, IP, and MPLS, and I am quite sure that IP and MPLS > > > clients can take care of themselves wrt detecting peer failure. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >> John > > > >> > > > >> Sent from my iPhone > > > >> > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) > > > >>> [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com] > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:47 AM > > > >>> To: John E Drake; Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; > mpls@ietf.org; > > > mpls- > > > >>> tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team > > > >>> Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > > >>> ondraft-he-mpls- > > > tp- > > > >>> csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > >>> But what about other client services... e.g. adapted by > > > >>> service-LSP > > > and > > > >>> not by PWE3? > > > >>> > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On > > > Behalf Of > > > >>> ext John E Drake > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:35 PM > > > >>> To: Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; > > > >>> mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team > > > >>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > >>> I am not convinced. It seems like it belongs in the > Pseudo Wire > > > >>> application, which already has this capability. > > > >>> > > > >>> Sent from my iPhone > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > From: Yuanlong Jiang [mailto:yljiang@huawei.com] > > > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:07 AM > > > >>> > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; > > > pwe3@ietf.org; > > > >>> > MPLS-TP ad hoc team > > > >>> > Subject: [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll on > > > >>> > draft-he-mpls-tp-csf- > > > >>> 03.txt > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Support. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I believe this mechanism is needed in MPLS-TP. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Thanks > > > >>> > Yuanlong > > > >>> > > > > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>> > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> > > > >>> > To: <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; > > > >>> > "MPLS- > > > TP ad > > > >>> > hoc > > > >>> > team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> > > > >>> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:56 PM > > > >>> > Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > all, > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > this is to start a two week poll on making > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03. > > > >>> > > txt > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > a mpls working group document. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Please send comments support/not support to the mpls-tp > > > maililng > > > >>> > list. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > The poll ends Thursday Dec 2, 2010. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > /Loa > > > >>> > > -- > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > Loa Andersson email: > > > >>> > loa.andersson@ericsson.com > > > >>> > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu > > > >>> > > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 > 10 717 52 13 > > > >>> > > +46 > 767 72 92 > > > >>> > > 13 _______________________________________________ > > > >>> > > mpls-tp mailing list > > > >>> > > mpls-tp@ietf.org > > > >>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> pwe3 mailing list > > > >>> pwe3@ietf.org > > > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > pwe3 mailing list > > > > pwe3@ietf.org > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls mailing list > > > mpls@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls mailing list > > > mpls@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ > pwe3 mailing list > pwe3@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 >
- [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Autumn Liu
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt zhanghaiyan
- Re: [mpls-tp] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll on draft-he-mp… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Vivien Sterling
- Re: [mpls-tp] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll on draft-he-mp… Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… neil.2.harrison
- [mpls-tp] CSF architecture [was: RE: [PWE3] poll … Maarten Vissers
- Re: [mpls-tp] CSF architecture [was: RE: [PWE3] p… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll on draft-he-mp… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-… LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll … LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll … andy.bd.reid
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll … Maarten Vissers
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: pollon… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: pollon… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Maarten Vissers
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Ben Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Jiang Yuanlong
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Benjamin Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls][PWE3][AHMPLS-TP] poll on dra… lizhong.jin
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls][PWE3][AHMPLS-TP] poll on dra… Phil Bedard