[mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110
Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Mon, 28 June 2010 17:42 UTC
Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 2089A3A685F for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.264,
BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYqs4R0-MCHB for
<mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02193A67B4 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com;
dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuIFAAN8KExAaHte/2dsb2JhbACfMGsGpkmBeQsBmDOFJAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,498,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="150865729"
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com ([64.104.123.94]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2010 17:42:31 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by
hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5SHgTn2020918 for
<mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:42:30 GMT
Received: from dhcp-gpk02-vlan300-64-103-65-9.cisco.com (localhost
[127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id o5SHgR615775;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:42:28 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4C28DF03.7020103@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:42:27 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:42:23 -0000
Several people have pointed out a discrepancy in the model for MPLS as documented in G.8110. Since this formal model plays a major role in the ITU-T MPLS-TP G.8110.1 specification, the error should to be corrected before publication. I therefore propose that we send the following liaison to the ITU-T. - Stewart =============== To: ITU-T WP3/15 From: IETF Dear Dr. Trowbridge, We note that G.8110 is referenced as a normative reference from the draft text of the revision of G.8110.1. We also note that G.8110 is now five years old, and has received no contributions for update over that period. G.8110 has been described as "not covering all of MPLS and certainly not what has happened in the last five years." We believe that G.8110.1 should document MPLS-TP accurately. It is important, therefore, that where the model for MPLS-TP differs from that described in G.8110, the correct model be developed and documented in G.8110.1. We would like to draw your attention in specifically to Section 6.2.2 of G.8110 (and, in particular, Figures 1 and 2) that says that the Time-To-Live (TTL) field of an MPLS header is part of the Characteristic Information (CI) of an MPLS_CI traffic unit. We note that according to G.805, the CI is supposed to be delivered end-to-end between MPLS APs without modification or inspection. But the function of a TTL in an MPLS-TP network is to be decremented at each hop along the path, and to be inspected at each hop and tested against zero. Thus, in the model for MPLS-TP, the TTL should not form part of the CI. We request that G.8110.1 be updated to include this revision to the model. This might most easily be achieved by augmenting the references to G.8110 with updated figures based on those in G.8110 along with appropriate text explaining the differences in the model such that G.8110.1 correctly captures the model for MPLS-TP. ==========
- [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 David Sinicrope
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 David Allan I
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 alan.mcguire
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Luca Martini