Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
Yuanlong Jiang <yljiang@huawei.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 01:17 UTC
Return-Path: <yljiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 47E4E3A63EC; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:17:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMqbKqVPQGJG;
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7C03A682E;
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:17:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id
<0LCS001PT0ZN6H@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:18:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet
Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id
<0LCS008YU0ZN1D@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:18:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from j59929 ([10.70.40.100]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet
Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id
<0LCS00LQX0ZNBZ@szxml06-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:18:59 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:18:59 +0800
From: Yuanlong Jiang <yljiang@huawei.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "Sprecher,
Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>,
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org,
MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
Message-id: <006701cb91be$e5b529a0$6428460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <4CE51469.2020105@pi.nu>
<00c201cb9137$0e7b1fd0$6428460a@china.huawei.com>
<5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C53F6CF1@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
<077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A532640301C477@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
<5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB33316398C53F6D0C@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll
ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:17:57 -0000
John, Typically, IP will only detect a failure in a time scale of minutes. That is one reason why MPLS-TP OAM and Protection & Switching is needed. I am not sure which mechanism in MPLS provides the CSF-like capability, could you give more hints? Thanks Yuanlong ----- Original Message ----- From: "John E Drake" <jdrake@juniper.net> To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>om>; "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>om>; "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>nu>; <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:29 PM Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > Nurit, > > As I understand the original requirement from Malcolm Betts, this > capability is required for those cases in which a client is unable to > detect the failure of its peer. In MPLS-TP, we have three clients, PW, > IP, and MPLS, and I am quite sure that IP and MPLS clients can take care > of themselves wrt detecting peer failure. > > Thanks, > > John > > Sent from my iPhone > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) >> [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:47 AM >> To: John E Drake; Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls- >> tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team >> Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll ondraft-he-mpls-tp- >> csf-03.txt >> >> But what about other client services... e.g. adapted by service-LSP and >> not by PWE3? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> ext John E Drake >> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:35 PM >> To: Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; >> pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team >> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll >> ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt >> >> I am not convinced. It seems like it belongs in the Pseudo Wire >> application, which already has this capability. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Yuanlong Jiang [mailto:yljiang@huawei.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:07 AM >> > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; >> > MPLS-TP ad hoc team >> > Subject: [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf- >> 03.txt >> > >> > Support. >> > >> > I believe this mechanism is needed in MPLS-TP. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Yuanlong >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> >> > To: <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad >> > hoc >> > team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> >> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:56 PM >> > Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt >> > >> > >> > > all, >> > > >> > > this is to start a two week poll on making >> > > >> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt >> > > >> > > a mpls working group document. >> > > >> > > Please send comments support/not support to the mpls-tp maililng >> > list. >> > > >> > > The poll ends Thursday Dec 2, 2010. >> > > >> > > /Loa >> > > -- >> > > >> > > >> > > Loa Andersson email: >> > loa.andersson@ericsson.com >> > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu >> > > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 >> > > +46 767 72 92 13 >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > mpls-tp mailing list >> > > mpls-tp@ietf.org >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pwe3 mailing list >> pwe3@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 >
- [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Autumn Liu
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt zhanghaiyan
- Re: [mpls-tp] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll on draft-he-mp… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… Vivien Sterling
- Re: [mpls-tp] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll on draft-he-mp… Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Yuanlong Jiang
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… neil.2.harrison
- [mpls-tp] CSF architecture [was: RE: [PWE3] poll … Maarten Vissers
- Re: [mpls-tp] CSF architecture [was: RE: [PWE3] p… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll on draft-he-mp… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll ondraft… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-… LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll … LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll … andy.bd.reid
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: poll … Maarten Vissers
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: pollon… Manuel.Paul
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] [AHMPLS-TP]Re: pollon… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Maarten Vissers
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Ben Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Jiang Yuanlong
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Benjamin Niven-Jenkins
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls][PWE3][AHMPLS-TP] poll on dra… lizhong.jin
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls][PWE3][AHMPLS-TP] poll on dra… Phil Bedard