Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
Mukund Mani <mukund.mani@gmail.com> Mon, 20 December 2010 11:46 UTC
Return-Path: <mukund.mani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BFD3A6A3B; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:46:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8IH7Ky7qurJV; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09293A6A3A; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so326947yie.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:48:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hqMifdFOodDWzWArOqpgFr+TWZH89zdQd/MMfHOIaXI=; b=pKrT5mA3y0KgDhIaX+RWqc3wN92ZYHSEQnUlrZu6D2mPH3Jq6O/uYYUGoUPIWGFhJz tP5RnQHut7LrJQo0D10k7hWoLLE+99YO6vq6bumGgNDBzsUI2tl8C/nUo3fx2/iEzbE7 CFrFkNHIo8JmNcAs/7ss4gZbQ/4LJAIddeXM8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wot0moCaetxwkdiAxqgTkUoz8JLTOaDYPZqfXTNf9xlOJW0KYPmxGMLyAh6vg1PzzG /FnXN/6X55spF6oN1SKbDSo7qtUkJaqidS+Fg6iZA7bHQkec1GXRxjkmVICYCjXXFmqO SJsz7ZG1QBlY4jtYgHpi+I/omjI9JddEUrZbA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.95.41 with SMTP id o29mr7266093yhf.29.1292845693944; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.105.172 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:18:13 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=0Lwx6Gjy62VazFPDVOVf03BO+hHQnbHzog7Yz@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mukund Mani <mukund.mani@gmail.com>
To: mpls-tp@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00235448f2595658b90497d61813"
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:46:21 -0000
Support With Regards Mukund Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:53:45 -0500 From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com> Subject: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts To: <mpls@ietf.org>, <mpls-tp@ietf.org> Message-ID: <C92E9509.A06D%swallow@cisco.com<C92E9509.A06D%25swallow@cisco.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Folks - We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications. In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two. One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup documents as draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile. This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup drafts. A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay. The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC. George and Loa
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Elisa Bellagamba
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Scott Mansfield
- [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts George Swallow
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Luyuan Fang (lufang)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Agrahara Kiran Koushik
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Phil Bedard
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts wei.hongbo
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… binny jeshan
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts Vero Zheng
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Dela… George Swallow