Re: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

Support.

Mach

--------------------------------------------------
From: "George Swallow" <swallow@cisco.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:53 AM
To: <mpls@ietf.org>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls-tp] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

> Folks -
>
> We have had a number of requests to extend draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay 
> to
> cover more general MPLS applications.  In discussions among the authors 
> and
> co-chairs, we believe that it would be less confusing to all involved to
> split the document into two.
> One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the mechanisms 
> and
> one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.
>
> Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed workgroup
> documents as
> draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.
>
> This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as workgroup
> drafts.
>
> A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.
>
> A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content being added 
> to
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.
>
> The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC.
>
> George and Loa
>

> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
> 