IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Wed, 15 December 2010 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD33E3A7004; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:15:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJocFI7L5arW; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:15:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EE33A7033; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:14:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oBF6FhIg023140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:15:43 +0100
Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (demuexc023.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oBF6FhtU013447; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:15:43 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.25]) by demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:15:42 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB9C1F.8070B159"
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:13:30 +0100
Message-ID: <077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A532640313D19E@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <FC8BAD2D-2C33-4726-B8EC-BEFC156D342C@pi.nu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC
Thread-Index: Acubzilw30yjQhFBS8mjmEprV19ckAAT08yg
References: <575335.64858.qm@web15602.mail.cnb.yahoo.com><CF9E38FB-E55F-468C-9082-1F62E80A896F@asgaard.org><4D0721EA.1030103@gmail.com><0029E41E-2032-421C-B6AC-FCC5CF3D736E@cdl.asgaard.org><4D0749B0.7070103@gmail.com> <FC8BAD2D-2C33-4726-B8EC-BEFC156D342C@pi.nu>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "ext Loa@pi.nu" <loa@pi.nu>, "Huub van Helvoort" <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2010 06:15:42.0621 (UTC) FILETIME=[80A1FCD0:01CB9C1F]
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, Ad hoc MPLS-TP <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:15:16 -0000

Hi,

I agree with Loa….! The number of authors has never been a criteria to accept or oppose a document. 

I think the main issue with this draft is that (at least most of) the authors are not open to discuss it tool by tool and indicate for each specific tool, what are the issues with the solutions being developed (in the WG documents) that they are trying to address when presenting another solution.

If this is something technical, we should discuss it (tool by tool). I am sure that any technical issue can be resolved (probably even in the frame of the solution being developed in the WG document).  We want to develop quality standards and any technical discussion can contribute to it. 

I would like to encourage to review the WG documents and comment…

Best regards,

Nurit

 

 

From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Loa@pi.nu
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:33 PM
To: Huub van Helvoort
Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Ad hoc MPLS-TP; mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC

 



Skickat från min iPhone


14 dec 2010 kl. 11:40 skrev Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>om>:

	Hej Christopher,
	
	Please see in-line [hvh]

<snip>




[hvh] one of the reasons for *not* accepting it as WG draft was that
there were too many co-authors.

Huub,

 

You kbps as well as I do that this statement is not true.

 

It was pointed out to the authors of the document that it did not follow the guidelines for IDs, too many names on the front page. 

Further this was done in a context where it was not even asked that the document should be accepted as a wg doc!





/Loa

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email