Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
"Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 14:37 UTC
Return-Path: <eosborne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6C9D428C0D0; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:37:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pcNIxQTyyyv4;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622B93A695A;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:37:05 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com;
dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An8CABc+90ytJXHA/2dsb2JhbACUUY5Qcac0mwgChUUEhF5VhEKECA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,288,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="188377865"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by
rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2010 14:38:20 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138])
by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB2EcKb0017459;
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:38:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-202.cisco.com ([72.163.62.209]) by
xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:38:20 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:38:18 -0600
Message-ID: <D29E470202D67745B61059870F433B5403A8A38E@XMB-RCD-202.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp]pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcuSIsOuufii+EmrRR6zdRegAAiNTAAAEK3wAALYf+A=
From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: "LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)" <lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com>,
"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>,
"Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2010 14:38:20.0296 (UTC)
FILETIME=[90A34080:01CB922E]
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, pwe3@ietf.org,
mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP]
Re: pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:37:08 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN) > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:17 AM > To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Sprecher,Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad hoc > team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:[mpls-tp] pollondraft-he-mpls- > tp-csf-03.txt > > provocative statement alert- We should as we are talking about MPLS-TP and > not about IP network layer. > OK, so maybe this is where I'm confused. Aren't we talking about a mechanism to indicate to a *client* of TP that there's a problem (thus, Client Signal Fail)? eric > ./ > Lieven > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Rajiv Asati (rajiva) > Sent: 02 December 2010 14:14 > To: Yuanlong Jiang > Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad hoc team; > mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] pollondraft-he-mpls- > tp-csf-03.txt > > Are we ignoring the existence of BFD altogether? > > Cheers, > Rajiv > > Sent from my Phone > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Yuanlong Jiang <yljiang@huawei.com> wrote: > > > John, > > > > Typically, IP will only detect a failure in a time scale of minutes. > > That is one reason why MPLS-TP OAM and Protection & Switching is needed. > > I am not sure which mechanism in MPLS provides the CSF-like capability, > could you give more hints? > > > > Thanks > > Yuanlong > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John E Drake" <jdrake@juniper.net> > > To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" > > <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>om>; "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>om>; "Loa > > Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>nu>; <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; > > <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:29 PM > > Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > > ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > > > > > >> Nurit, > >> > >> As I understand the original requirement from Malcolm Betts, this > capability is required for those cases in which a client is unable to > detect the failure of its peer. In MPLS-TP, we have three clients, PW, > IP, and MPLS, and I am quite sure that IP and MPLS clients can take care > of themselves wrt detecting peer failure. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> John > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) > >>> [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:47 AM > >>> To: John E Drake; Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; > >>> mpls- tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team > >>> Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp- csf-03.txt > >>> > >>> But what about other client services... e.g. adapted by service-LSP > >>> and not by PWE3? > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > >>> Of ext John E Drake > >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:35 PM > >>> To: Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; > >>> pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team > >>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll > >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > >>> > >>> I am not convinced. It seems like it belongs in the Pseudo Wire > >>> application, which already has this capability. > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- > >>> > From: Yuanlong Jiang [mailto:yljiang@huawei.com] > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:07 AM > >>> > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; > >>> > MPLS-TP ad hoc team > >>> > Subject: [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf- > >>> 03.txt > >>> > > >>> > Support. > >>> > > >>> > I believe this mechanism is needed in MPLS-TP. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks > >>> > Yuanlong > >>> > > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- > >>> > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> > >>> > To: <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP > >>> > ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int> > >>> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:56 PM > >>> > Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > all, > >>> > > > >>> > > this is to start a two week poll on making > >>> > > > >>> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt > >>> > > > >>> > > a mpls working group document. > >>> > > > >>> > > Please send comments support/not support to the mpls-tp maililng > >>> > list. > >>> > > > >>> > > The poll ends Thursday Dec 2, 2010. > >>> > > > >>> > > /Loa > >>> > > -- > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Loa Andersson email: > >>> > loa.andersson@ericsson.com > >>> > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu > >>> > > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 > >>> > > +46 767 72 92 13 > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > >>> > > mpls-tp mailing list > >>> > > mpls-tp@ietf.org > >>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> pwe3 mailing list > >>> pwe3@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pwe3 mailing list > > pwe3@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… Eric Osborne (eosborne)
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:pollon… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollo… LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)