Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt

"Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <eosborne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9D428C0D0; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:37:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pcNIxQTyyyv4; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622B93A695A; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 06:37:05 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: An8CABc+90ytJXHA/2dsb2JhbACUUY5Qcac0mwgChUUEhF5VhEKECA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,288,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="188377865"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2010 14:38:20 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB2EcKb0017459; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:38:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-202.cisco.com ([72.163.62.209]) by xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:38:20 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:38:18 -0600
Message-ID: <D29E470202D67745B61059870F433B5403A8A38E@XMB-RCD-202.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp]pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcuSIsOuufii+EmrRR6zdRegAAiNTAAAEK3wAALYf+A=
From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: "LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)" <lieven.levrau@alcatel-lucent.com>, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>, "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2010 14:38:20.0296 (UTC) FILETIME=[90A34080:01CB922E]
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, MPLS-TP ad hoc team <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, pwe3@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: pollondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:37:08 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:17 AM
> To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); Yuanlong Jiang
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; Sprecher,Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad
hoc
> team; pwe3@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re:[mpls-tp]
pollondraft-he-mpls-
> tp-csf-03.txt
> 
> provocative statement alert- We should as we are talking about MPLS-TP
and
> not about IP network layer.
> 

OK, so maybe this is where I'm confused.  Aren't we talking about a
mechanism to indicate to a *client* of TP that there's a problem (thus,
Client Signal Fail)?



eric


> ./
> Lieven
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
> Sent: 02 December 2010 14:14
> To: Yuanlong Jiang
> Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); MPLS-TP ad hoc team;
> mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp]
pollondraft-he-mpls-
> tp-csf-03.txt
> 
> Are we ignoring the existence of BFD altogether?
> 
> Cheers,
> Rajiv
> 
> Sent from my Phone
> 
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Yuanlong Jiang <yljiang@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > John,
> >
> > Typically, IP will only detect a failure in a time scale of minutes.
> > That is one reason why MPLS-TP OAM and Protection & Switching is
needed.
> > I am not sure which mechanism in MPLS provides the CSF-like
capability,
> could you give more hints?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yuanlong
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John E Drake"
<jdrake@juniper.net>
> > To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)"
> > <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>om>; "Yuanlong Jiang" <yljiang@huawei.com>om>;
"Loa
> > Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>nu>; <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>;
> > <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>; "MPLS-TP ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:29 PM
> > Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll
> > ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> >
> >
> >> Nurit,
> >>
> >> As I understand the original requirement from Malcolm Betts, this
> capability is required for those cases in which a client is unable to
> detect the failure of its peer.  In MPLS-TP, we have three clients,
PW,
> IP, and MPLS, and I am quite sure that IP and MPLS clients can take
care
> of themselves wrt detecting peer failure.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
> >>> [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 4:47 AM
> >>> To: John E Drake; Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org;
> >>> mpls- tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> >>> Subject: RE: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll
> >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp- csf-03.txt
> >>>
> >>> But what about other client services... e.g. adapted by
service-LSP
> >>> and not by PWE3?
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf
> >>> Of ext John E Drake
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:35 PM
> >>> To: Yuanlong Jiang; Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org;
mpls-tp@ietf.org;
> >>> pwe3@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> >>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll
> >>> ondraft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> >>>
> >>> I am not convinced.  It seems like it belongs in the Pseudo Wire
> >>> application, which already has this capability.
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: Yuanlong Jiang [mailto:yljiang@huawei.com]
> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:07 AM
> >>> > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org;
pwe3@ietf.org;
> >>> > MPLS-TP ad hoc team
> >>> > Subject: [AHMPLS-TP] Re: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-
> >>> 03.txt
> >>> >
> >>> > Support.
> >>> >
> >>> > I believe this mechanism is needed in MPLS-TP.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> > Yuanlong
> >>> >
> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu>
> >>> > To: <mpls@ietf.org>rg>; <mpls-tp@ietf.org>rg>; <pwe3@ietf.org>rg>;
"MPLS-TP
> >>> > ad hoc team" <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>
> >>> > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:56 PM
> >>> > Subject: [mpls-tp] poll on draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > all,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > this is to start a two week poll on making
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-he-mpls-tp-csf-03.txt
> >>> > >
> >>> > > a mpls working group document.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Please send comments support/not support to the mpls-tp
maililng
> >>> > list.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > The poll ends Thursday Dec 2, 2010.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > /Loa
> >>> > > --
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Loa Andersson                         email:
> >>> > loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> >>> > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> >>> > > Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
> >>> > >                                              +46 767 72 92 13
> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> >>> > > mpls-tp mailing list
> >>> > > mpls-tp@ietf.org
> >>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pwe3 mailing list
> >>> pwe3@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls