Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110
"BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)" <italo.busi@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 29 June 2010 10:34 UTC
Return-Path: <italo.busi@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4EBA63A699A for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.070,
BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDaHoZ++lTuj for
<mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2AB3A67D9 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>;
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com
(FRMRSSXCHHUB03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.63]) by smail3.alcatel.fr
(8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id o5TAYBE8015009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:34:53 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.40]) by
FRMRSSXCHHUB03.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.63]) with mapi;
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:34:25 +0200
From: "BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)" <italo.busi@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>,
"alan.mcguire@bt.com" <alan.mcguire@bt.com>,
"stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:34:24 +0200
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110
Thread-Index: AcsW6VBy3ocYboP/SwegUUzYhsJtbwAcCKyAAAABC9AABa1pEAABMt/w
Message-ID: <15740615FC9674499FBCE797B011623F0B6E9C59@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4C28DF03.7020103@cisco.com><15740615FC9674499FBCE797B011623F0B6E9B0D@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
<4CC2173AA6BF374C984F501B7453AAD198CB07F305@EMV66-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
<077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A53264024B2373@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A53264024B2373@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.83
Cc: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:34:51 -0000
Nurit, I have already raised some specific questions for clarification about your last point. What has been changed in MPLS TTL processing in the last 5 years? Why do you think TTL processing in MPLS-TP is different from TTL processing in MPLS? What are actually these differences? I recall I raised a specific question during the last Q12/15 meeting to check whether the TTL processing in MPLS-TP is the same as in MPLS. All those present at that meeting (including ISOC representatives) agreed that the TTL processing is the same. If this answer that I got at the meeting is incorrect, I would appreciate to understand why. I do not buy the argument that G.8110 is five years old. RFC 3031 is nine years old but this is not precluding us to make normative reference to it. During the development of G.8110.1 a lot of care has been taken by the editor and technical contributors to reuse the functional model of G.8110 when appropriate and to develop extensions to this model where needed. I would appreciate if you can point to a specific technical item that has not been properly captured in this work. Italo ________________________________ From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon) [mailto:nurit.sprecher@nsn.com] Sent: martedì 29 giugno 2010 12.09 To: alan.mcguire@bt.com; BUSI, ITALO (ITALO); stbryant@cisco.com Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org Subject: RE: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Hi, It is correct that the CI is transferred on a "network connection" which is formed by a series of contiguous "link connections" and/or "subnetwork connections" between "termination connection points". We should fix the proposed liaison accordingly! Still the concern is valid. G.805 refers to the generation (at the source), transport and termination (at the sink) of CI (in the context of a layer network), and also to the interworking of CI of one layer network with the CI another layer, but not to the processing of the CI at each transport entity or port along the network connection. Therefore I support the liaison with the correction of TCPs and not APs. I think also that the fact that G.8110 (which is used as a normative reference) has not been updated since 2005, raises more concerns. MPLS was worked out since 2005 and there is a need to understand the gaps and check consistencies, etc. Best regards, Nurit <<Snipped>>
- [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Varma, Eve L (Eve)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 David Sinicrope
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 David Allan I
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 alan.mcguire
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 BUSI, ITALO (ITALO)
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] Proposed liaison to ITU-T on G.8110 Luca Martini