[mpls-tp] New I-D draft-xiao-mpls-tp-lm-counting-extension-00
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Tue, 06 July 2010 05:38 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id C212F3A6949 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zrq0Jwim1L8i for
<mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4F03A68F0 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>;
Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id
55234764009499; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:38:03 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.19] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id
97020.764009499; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:31:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse2.zte.com.cn with
ESMTP id o665cPI2054855 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>;
Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:38:25 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
To: mpls-tp@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005
Message-ID: <OF9753D002.184A40BC-ON48257758.001EAD4C-48257758.001EC4E5@zte.com.cn>
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:38:04 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.4|March 27,
2005) at 2010-07-06 13:38:18, Serialize complete at 2010-07-06 13:38:18
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_alternative 001EC4E248257758_="
X-MAIL: mse2.zte.com.cn o665cPI2054855
Subject: [mpls-tp] New I-D draft-xiao-mpls-tp-lm-counting-extension-00
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 05:38:40 -0000
Hi TP-Group, A new Internet Draft titled "Extension to Packet Loss Measurement for Counting Activation and Deactivation" has been submitted: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xiao-mpls-tp-lm-counting-extension-00 When MPLS-TP OAM function Packet Loss Measurement is performed, counting the transmitted and received packets at both the source MEP and the sink MEP needs to be activated at first. This document specifies OAM packets and protocol mechanism to facilitate the counting activation and deactivation at the sink MEP, and leave out the unnecessary management configuration at the sink MEP when the MPLS-TP connection is bidirectional or there exists an out-of-band return path. Any comments and discussion are welcome. Best Regards, Xiao Min