IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC

"Loa@pi.nu" <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 14 December 2010 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E1228C11B; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:31:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.694
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrfrApjXG4DT; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC2A28C106; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2.71.242.211] (unknown [2.71.242.211]) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A614C514038; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:33:16 +0100 (CET)
References: <575335.64858.qm@web15602.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <CF9E38FB-E55F-468C-9082-1F62E80A896F@asgaard.org> <4D0721EA.1030103@gmail.com> <0029E41E-2032-421C-B6AC-FCC5CF3D736E@cdl.asgaard.org> <4D0749B0.7070103@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D0749B0.7070103@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-518966676
Message-Id: <FC8BAD2D-2C33-4726-B8EC-BEFC156D342C@pi.nu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117)
From: "Loa@pi.nu" <loa@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:32:56 +0100
To: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Ad hoc MPLS-TP <ahmpls-tp@lists.itu.int>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] MPLS WG slides from CMCC
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:31:38 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

14 dec 2010 kl. 11:40 skrev Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>om>:

> Hej Christopher,
> 
> Please see in-line [hvh]
<snip>
> 
> [hvh] one of the reasons for *not* accepting it as WG draft was that
> there were too many co-authors.
> 
Huub,

You kbps as well as I do that this statement is not true.

It was pointed out to the authors of the document that it did not follow the guidelines for IDs, too many names on the front page. 
Further this was done in a context where it was not even asked that the document should be accepted as a wg doc!

/Loa
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email