Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts

["Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <[e-mail]>]

Support.
Luyuan


________________________________

	From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of George Swallow (swallow)
	Sent: 15 December 2010 15:54
	To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
	Subject: [mpls] One week poll on Loss / Delay drafts
	
	
	Folks -
	
	We have had a number of requests to extend
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay to cover more general MPLS applications.
In discussions among the authors and co-chairs, we believe that it would
be less confusing to all involved to split the document into two.
	One called draft-ietf-mpls-loss-delay which covers all of the
mechanisms and one called draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.
	
	Dan Frost has been kind enough to submit both of these proposed
workgroup documents as 
	draft-frpst-mpls-loss-delay and
draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile.
	
	This begins a one week poll to accept both of these drafts as
workgroup drafts.  
	
	A yes vote is to adopt these two drafts and terminate work on
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.
	
	A no vote would result in the additional MPLS related content
being added to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay.
	
	The poll ends December 22 at 24:00 UTC.
	
	George and Loa