[mpls-tp] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01
Mukund Mani <mukund.mani@gmail.com> Mon, 28 June 2010 11:23 UTC
Return-Path: <mukund.mani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id EA1AB3A699F for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.277,
BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Srfg55xU9VmW for
<mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1A23A680B for
<mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1370534vws.31 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=GXgaMDOvIfD4q9IyRwyxONHcL6PqEbqZ/eEXGFgW6Lg=;
b=FWJZteq08XYZaOstZcI9QA+p3uM794Q2bp1koqh6hRP9yIePnklW+KGoUy369+LhHt
h1OY5eTkDMIXraqwK0lufsHONJwfvTTxXUvfH0fFJRmKNCrNosy607dQ+szw04zswhe9
KzU5nluqbw+6+nqxLaZ0vTYUdJjCVcddmasco=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
b=KmbepNk9sJ1obaHNo22R2DRcxJ4bKsXX1gEenIXHpLnkR7zaG2cNR/2qCmWPX1WVZT
QfFhAjBRVSfSYS/qsz48lFZQBgrbLPwIJWE1aqGnPfd/IU2tlDuDslX1BGLrqtW0ugYw
eJm/nezlBt+OvOsMU5qdaSPLrn/PRyncfUVKM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.245.68 with SMTP id lt4mr2489655qcb.71.1277724189238;
Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.88.73 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:53:09 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTilKbgDoiU9EE7w7dFNbRo46SVyI_S2dADcfsssi@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mukund Mani <mukund.mani@gmail.com>
To: yaacov.weingarten@nsn.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a73e6bba1c048a15585a
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls-tp] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>,
<mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:23:03 -0000
Hi Yaacov Have a small question w.r.t draft "*draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01". * Wanted to know if this draft applies for Pseudowires as well.. Will the same PSC mechanism be used for PseudoWire protection switching also...? There are some drafts eg"draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-03" in the PWE3 group which talk about PW protection. ** Quoting the Survivability Framewrok which specifies the following: Pseudowires provide end-to-end connectivity over the MPLS-TP network and may comprise a single pseudowire segment, or multiple segments "stitched" together to provide end-to-end connectivity. The pseudowire may, itself, require a level of protection, in order to meet the service-level guarantees of its SLA. This protection could be provided by the MPLS-TP LSPs that support the pseudowire, or could be a feature of the pseudowire layer itself. As indicated above, the functional architecture described in this document applies to both LSPs and pseudowires. *However, the recovery mechanisms for pseudowires are for further study and will be defined in a separate document by the PWE3 working group. * Aside from this generally we talk about PW's as bidirectional.. Would 1:1 unidirectional protection switching be applicable for PW as well? ** Looking forward for your reply... Thanks With Regards Mukund
- [mpls-tp] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-tp-line… Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls-tp] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-tp-… Mukund Mani
- Re: [mpls-tp] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-tp-… Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)