Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 12 December 2021 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546DB3A0112 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:31:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GulelfvX8SiG for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777DC3A00E5 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.21.5.145] (unknown [115.147.36.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8354836557F; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 02:31:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <74c88801-1de0-943c-1977-d9b1beacf93c@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:31:34 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-CA
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <399e8983-c968-b919-2678-5f64531a357f@pi.nu> <CA+RyBmVOanCzrk=tcK=PwmK=4hSQiM6BGcn2HsHrGXgM1JU98A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVOanCzrk=tcK=PwmK=4hSQiM6BGcn2HsHrGXgM1JU98A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/-0Zdbbw8Iv2Py495Aphb82pNBMo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 01:31:47 -0000

Greg,

Thanks for reading and and commenting.

Inline please.

On 2021-12-12 09:12, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Loa,
> thank you for putting it all together. Now it is all so much clearer (to 
> me at least).
> I've got several questions and much appreciate your thoughts, 
> clarifications:
> 
>   * it appears that the first bSPL will always be used for i-indicators
>     even when all are cleared. If we accept the proposal to separate i-
>     and p-indicator spaces, perhaps the format might be like follows:
> 
>   0                   1                   2                   3
>   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> | Base Special Purpose Label  (TBD)     |t a a|S|a a a a a a a x|
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
> 
>                      Label:  Label Value, 20 bits
>                      a:      Ancillary Data Indicator (ADI)
>                      x:      extension bit
>                      t:      ADI type: 0 - ISD, 1 - PSD
>                      S:      Bottom of Stack, 1 bit
> 
>   * I imagine that indicators will be assigned to particular functions
>     and, at some point, 10th, then 19th, and probably more indicator
>     will be allocated. With the current encoding schema to set 10th
>     indicator will require two LSEs, 19th - three. Seems a bit
>     expensive. Do you think there's a benefit to look how to compress
>     the zeroes that fill the indicator space of the whole bSPL?
> 
This is precisely why I put the text together.

I'm perfectly willing to discuss "how to compress". as a matter of fact 
I thought a bit about it, but the ideas I had was too complicated. If 
anyone has ideas please bring them to the list.

/Loa
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:09 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu 
> <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
> 
>     Folk,
> 
>     I had a long flight yesterday and had to do something.
> 
>     https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/ADI-fields
>     <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/ADI-fields>
> 
>     /Loa
>     -- 
>     Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>
>     Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com <mailto:loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
>     Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpls mailing list
>     mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>
> 

-- 
Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64