Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 12 December 2021 01:31 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546DB3A0112 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:31:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GulelfvX8SiG for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777DC3A00E5 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 17:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.21.5.145] (unknown [115.147.36.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8354836557F; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 02:31:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <74c88801-1de0-943c-1977-d9b1beacf93c@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:31:34 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-CA
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <399e8983-c968-b919-2678-5f64531a357f@pi.nu> <CA+RyBmVOanCzrk=tcK=PwmK=4hSQiM6BGcn2HsHrGXgM1JU98A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVOanCzrk=tcK=PwmK=4hSQiM6BGcn2HsHrGXgM1JU98A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/-0Zdbbw8Iv2Py495Aphb82pNBMo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 01:31:47 -0000
Greg, Thanks for reading and and commenting. Inline please. On 2021-12-12 09:12, Greg Mirsky wrote: > Hi Loa, > thank you for putting it all together. Now it is all so much clearer (to > me at least). > I've got several questions and much appreciate your thoughts, > clarifications: > > * it appears that the first bSPL will always be used for i-indicators > even when all are cleared. If we accept the proposal to separate i- > and p-indicator spaces, perhaps the format might be like follows: > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Base Special Purpose Label (TBD) |t a a|S|a a a a a a a x| > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > Label: Label Value, 20 bits > a: Ancillary Data Indicator (ADI) > x: extension bit > t: ADI type: 0 - ISD, 1 - PSD > S: Bottom of Stack, 1 bit > > * I imagine that indicators will be assigned to particular functions > and, at some point, 10th, then 19th, and probably more indicator > will be allocated. With the current encoding schema to set 10th > indicator will require two LSEs, 19th - three. Seems a bit > expensive. Do you think there's a benefit to look how to compress > the zeroes that fill the indicator space of the whole bSPL? > This is precisely why I put the text together. I'm perfectly willing to discuss "how to compress". as a matter of fact I thought a bit about it, but the ideas I had was too complicated. If anyone has ideas please bring them to the list. /Loa > > Regards, > Greg > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:09 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu > <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote: > > Folk, > > I had a long flight yesterday and had to do something. > > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/ADI-fields > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/ADI-fields> > > /Loa > -- > Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu> > Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com <mailto:loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> > Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls> > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Open DT - thoughts for dicussion Loa Andersson