[mpls] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-15: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification.

I have noted this specificaiton uses RFC 9341 performance measurement methods.
RFC 9341 says -

   "the Alternate-Marking Method MUST only be applied to controlled domains."

Hence, I would like to discuss

  - if MPLS performance measurement will be done in "controlled domains" or
  not. If yes, should this specification not discuss and state about
  measurement done in "controlled domains"?

  - current security consideration does not describe the implications if the
  measurement is not done in the controlled domains, should this specification
  not describe those?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have not marked any other transport protocol related issues.