Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 29 January 2016 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858251ACED6 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:30:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NszybnkD1UnT for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067491ACEB1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x232.google.com with SMTP id wb13so32728204obb.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:30:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=JK/c2xr1Ao2CJaxccCHsyB6nj0lOcJeGafvdlimYQxs=; b=jW0HqLVhy992jVzwSV/mb+WJbzbl6P38CfA8kOhm9EvXx0wbF4EjdS5HE/cwXvhkPd 08VlZbYzZooZbYrU1/QgKwZN0cNPB0BE5qBtIcZHDDyw/xMnsVTwVyAerjosGFbrnJe5 jGtw6s1lybCxbnsBqWUEuBcExuPWrP0J+x92VP/K2cyEzQdmY+XdmPaMsPy9LJhIodCx 39OtJ1NgnLOkDAIJNs7t1GRQgZInLV2s9FrVuGroBvPefQb+jLsfoG2CyZbeCSUFY5OW VXmbaTVwLjlmNOkmT5enrmKlFJHaQoGo0nDFKIDvbm/jPxTVbRPpJkU30bixFPIdJdbF wyaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=JK/c2xr1Ao2CJaxccCHsyB6nj0lOcJeGafvdlimYQxs=; b=YG1nZif/EQ26su/9Yf63CSE1omRXNOzrXDI7YU/eIv/wq/nTvYOQXBsZ6EAnDBR3OZ cVNS+GsWhNKAIC+c9XnckN3WVxf2E5UGbIPp0yCFcb0D28GmozN+zJ7u6W3nen96AgZz L0gKbrHYu/kMotBsCo1OVc3dL+bko5jyXiZ3whmeS+xG+SSQ/mTm7o+C2NLsE9IRjwbA eRbkT4ZGdD3esIXTm59QijhKB6yaaWO+K9R/CE1RztyWSnep5i+llsdYsGouzUWs89/v Po+V6hw5yHC2kq8+9k+zs/6mEdzSpfanV0cu03IX7URlVpOILAFnKQdL5dogSiuDDjmX /q8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTbU1bNaWvhRuFUx5kqhi3HzDMTeT6ZPkOhkHz05xcrSgzmrKgKCNNHF3tBrNHrXh/xdC/8Vrmt5LGY/A==
X-Received: by 10.182.130.234 with SMTP id oh10mr7218438obb.58.1454081411369; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:30:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.196.104 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:29:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D2D0227E.4B200%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D2D0227E.4B200%acee@cisco.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:29:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU38n5_P5ixBxHS6s=iyaK1-t+2=a-y6=c7OB_bwknndtg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a0112ffd39f052a7ab5df"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/-g_H7Mi9lSlsxf1Lxtd9wmrnBWo>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:30:14 -0000

Loa,

IMHO, this is a useful draft and shouldn’t be abandoned. However, I’m not
expert enough with timing protocols to have an informed opinion of its
readiness for WG LC, I’ll defer that to the authors or implementors. I
would also like to see Acee’s comments addressed.

Cheers,
Andy

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> I’ve read the subject draft and think it offers a useful function to
> facilitate more accurate time synchronization in NTP/PTP deployments. One
> question I have is why the capability is signaled in the generic IGP TLV
> LSAs and LSPs rather than the TE advertisements when the document is
> scoped to RSVP-TE [RFC3209] LSPs? One reason I ask is that we are waiting
> on implementations of the OSPFv3 Extended LSAs draft. Having said that,
> OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 have separate registry for the TLV LSAs and section 8
> should reflect this. Also, OSPF Prefix/Link Attributes is now RFC 7684.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
> >Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 7:23 PM
> >To: Gregory Mirsky; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org
> >Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org
> >Subject: Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft
> >Working Group and authors,
> ><chair hat off>
> >As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
> ><chair hat on>
> >This draft has been a working group document since early August, but
> >there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.
> >There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
> >- there is total agreement on the draft
> >- there is no intrest in the draft
> >I have no basis to decide which is the case.
> >Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing
> >list if it is time to start the wglc.
> >/Loa
> >mpls wg co-chair
> >On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> >Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
> >>authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft
> >>believe that all comments received during the WG adoption call been
> >>addressed.
> >>Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as the
> >>next step.
> >>                 Regards,
> >>                                 Greg
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>mpls mailing list
> >>mpls@ietf.org
> >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>