Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Santosh Esale <sesale@juniper.net> Mon, 06 June 2016 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <sesale@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EAC12D105; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKWeLvUwFJBS; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D9812D1CA; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=JTHSr8Uy/k6vk3rIkssZIqDaHACGQjIMdLpW/Dxe+iE=; b=WiFUzC76NAdmkCauqDyUKscZKybPxy6JJKqbVE8N9C5nAKcRhrAUSatIGnV7sGmgCq/HgxVA5xcr634PahkiOgRpZb9I/6AKuOM6hm6NaBrAMOFYgq2T/oiZ3PcLP8qgawXlQOLGBn38K71pnJYZwnQ77xNEOw+qwtmwytEzZLo=
Received: from BY2PR05MB584.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.219.153) by BY2PR05MB581.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.219.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.511.8; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:12:41 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB584.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.219.153]) by BY2PR05MB584.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.219.153]) with mapi id 15.01.0506.016; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:12:41 +0000
From: Santosh Esale <sesale@juniper.net>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsOxGMvFU2OnmOU2BVJ/j8eLt15/cd5yA
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:12:41 +0000
Message-ID: <D37B1650.C66CE%sesale@juniper.net>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sesale@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2fb03099-863c-42e0-e0dc-08d38e3e8848
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB581; 5:a0M30icUYqFR3nTMRVETrDgFPAXPdqPsH+1SuFxG9OdcREjvkLuuWL5FOz0RgP1g7QbxNsx9jezQP+aGdPqYMObBiLyMjN+HmAofPaJ0Q2tXnP3SVi9Cp4Qt3KXvNEgasHGuBPDbanRcNtEfi1bu1Q==; 24:szttq8NeEbuT30QJUzWBGm7D5/Sf69L/3K9NAN/1YQkCYRN4H6inWrS1BijBm0+TAKk1XRI27ObFlA2ZXrRveowFpbhxmGrYO984NAVHvE0=; 7:K1uW3LbkjL5UjPpZQbV5L2s4VVWnM0syFCQF7/7TZwucVXZrBbX2ycCrgtqRncpXYHc7FkKNCbATjS9nRybMs+3HWpMmyVqDI1MrwGCWJGPJD0IpwznflzsHRX4AU1cm7ogeszfKOpLIy5CHDf2nz0ncJT1Ym1zfZ7eXkSjVLi0klJHjSXgzaAVcWJQHgdrrTvLfpTbnEFMMMOwD99AZkOBUcYtDMu1NqtO49wppZ1Y=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB581;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR05MB581D676630079136819FCF7D95C0@BY2PR05MB581.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(50582790962513)(100405760836317);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:BY2PR05MB581; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR05MB581;
x-forefront-prvs: 096507C068
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(377454003)(24454002)(252514010)(199003)(2501003)(4326007)(19580395003)(8936002)(2906002)(36756003)(3846002)(10400500002)(586003)(6116002)(102836003)(11100500001)(99286002)(19580405001)(68736007)(5004730100002)(3660700001)(86362001)(76176999)(83506001)(3280700002)(122556002)(87936001)(2900100001)(106356001)(2950100001)(5008740100001)(50986999)(106116001)(105586002)(5001770100001)(97736004)(54356999)(92566002)(15975445007)(77096005)(4001350100001)(81166006)(81156014)(5002640100001)(8676002)(66066001)(189998001)(101416001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB581; H:BY2PR05MB584.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1D386CC570E2DE47816F488720939FBF@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jun 2016 19:12:41.3715 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR05MB581
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/-nKMF4-aDDxcXLRbTJ608SJKcuQ>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:12:51 -0000
Support both the drafts. Cheers Santosh On 5/18/16, 3:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote: > >Working Group, > >This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- >yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group >documents. > >Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working >group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical >motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that >the document should not be adopted as a working group document. > >There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has >been started in parallel to this adoption poll > >The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR >poll has concluded. > >/Loa > >MPLS wg co-chair. >-- > > >Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson