IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Tue, 27 July 2010 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108223A69E8 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.427, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vJF3IFZqOlo for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BF73A6829 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTE7bIhEiMHPGFdqV3IzFl4ENZc9bYUzW@postini.com; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:12:04 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:09:59 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Yong Lucy <lucyyong@huawei.com>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, 'Shane Amante' <shane@castlepoint.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:09:56 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label
Thread-Index: Acsth0oUJSF/XWniQyWod9gx1LMJ/QABXatQ
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639844EED6E7@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <02ac01cb2d87$a1c83ac0$c7728182@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <02ac01cb2d87$a1c83ac0$c7728182@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639844EED6E7EMBX01HQjnprn_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:11:47 -0000

Lucy, we discussed this and decided it was better to have the egress control the values of the ELI it advertises.  Plus, getting a reserved value would be difficult

From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yong Lucy
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 5:31 AM
To: Kireeti Kompella; 'Shane Amante'; mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] entropy label indicator label in draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label

Hi Kireeti and Shane,

Could we consider use one of reserved label for ELI purpose? This will make implementation much easy, i.e. not need to keep the state for each ELI label. The approach can be used in general for RSVP-TE and BGP as well.

Regards,
Lucy

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status