Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
Nischal Sheth <nsheth@contrailsystems.com> Mon, 17 December 2012 06:38 UTC
Return-Path: <nsheth@contrailsystems.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA5721F898B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZbwaB4f0RMYZ for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F095321F8973 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id uo1so3395713pbc.31 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=pqW0zxedlC9KEXbgO0/4Ku0oyupuFdWTJIPRZ7nKe9c=; b=iJbRYFMRRpm5+QyRFhRb/9pg2U+7mapV+enFlCiO4a5Dl72wHRjWvfibVIA3qN8vWV DqQr9FLRzlW3kF+RW9I1lhsWnPj/qwJal9qM9KeMq41cY/EJEh3e6TA4wGmV9A90TVbZ NF2yKOy+udRAa0CtZAnqE+1MNVbOohHIS4lqMviZYtzQrQkQOvH7AprqsHUVJyew8vqv Vg81FCILvuiBKI6PqwDeKB+8CLmtNvY4lRNcPTMu+QNTpw/a93kXyReAKJDLrFTw9HWs +ZXNTRty1MOvksYmPwm3rexDlZHXsnKdrJX6/Mkpr9weA0nWFRjSIXJ46q1mInWaCowg s6Mg==
Received: by 10.66.78.100 with SMTP id a4mr39915477pax.4.1355726284812; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.108] (c-24-4-109-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.4.109.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tq4sm1642739pbc.50.2012.12.16.22.38.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
From: Nischal Sheth <nsheth@contrailsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <50CAEAD4.6000705@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:38:04 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8C4ED2A0-F6E7-4DA8-84D1-BEFF0D5557A1@contrailsystems.com>
References: <50CAEAD4.6000705@pi.nu>
To: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlS2ij1N5mYG18VnWHEAvkiacQ6n1VrSxI7no4WN3E4QDcGsHKPiGh33+ij185/qioo3bP8
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:38:05 -0000
Support as a co-author. -Nischal
- [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make dra… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Vivek Kumar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Nischal Sheth
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Puneet Agarwal
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Rogers, Josh
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS over U… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Adrian Farrel
- [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlying n… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS ov… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- [mpls] MPLS over L2TP over UDP//re: poll to see i… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- [mpls] Poll ended - poll to see if we have suppor… Loa Andersson