Re: [mpls] Closed: 3rd WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed

Greg Mirsky <> Tue, 13 June 2017 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054F2129451; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EjytYb-FgLUZ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3783129427; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id s3so74356329oia.0; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p+tpsKZ2lF+HpgchvN0M3QDqnXxnPVamTd9Lu+LJ/FA=; b=rodKmX9aZq+KSx28wbfaxz8LXVAvcNZtlT8PQ59E+aJ+1TNbuMZFxG69Sei1lA+pgx Cm0zypokTRhmRdIVfpkTWDBUFg88eOomy572MtxmWxFIFxcSWz4wT3W2yhxfIs9nyL/v BQyM9/SEiSJhX5SgjnKiDu4QfZv9LwJZ2VHmB8kZbLKDb+SWE9GEkVYD+mcWZScRfayp W75kZ7H/wtCP070U8riUiie8I5lVjorSFxEbJUDBPe6Yel7oLkv8eNQrnl/fh+ipYxq+ cX01qZI+WDXy9VJWAO73rlZTVM8gDxLG3w4ajCT0NlNpmyhtft6shAIFKWQvMcHmUK3u dNfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p+tpsKZ2lF+HpgchvN0M3QDqnXxnPVamTd9Lu+LJ/FA=; b=lnBCuy2+CuOGhoWdRNXWRf06fBO4eY7Fo9+FjGBzKqGTbIGQqcvtG7vhQs9aW4wMq1 NN/+KuKMkOEDPpz6anmV78yBlPMDJrhYFfTcnMS/YXXM0bP8bZlDmTQqmCNPqWsVmzgp TbTOGDZzpfb9mzWiS6672YEJO3wj0sZYhG/Gxbx1NLCXCKI4gK84eWDY+5nEgZvphaxF aC/ifg/sLfmIf1pdiuaS0KXy1uvRurqG8k+OuvT5a9lQJZkBLxNvkN1DIqWLxBZX7m+s iIu8aZLPUvW1IwqmRvpZ2CTPBqPpk6sb0Hu/WW9bwtD2zfoZGOkkPLsm6BcqnDJaIRS+ yNLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyic83LDRjTZHCkPshdRslfzKVCbufcOG5Eu91zortUvCBkBy9H IxTIxMy1zSeEOhl1fxHxyjsrbQLAbQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id z7mr756072oiz.75.1497377237186; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
From: Greg Mirsky <>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:07:16 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: "" <>
Cc: "" <>,, Jeff Tantsura <>, iLya <>, Mach Chen <>, "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cd192513e3d0551db4ec1"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed: 3rd WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:07:20 -0000

Hi Nick,
authors greatly appreciate the consideration and comments this work
received during the WG LC. Update to address technical and editorial
comments just been posted as 07 version
<>. We invite
all who participated in the discussion to check the latest version and let
us know if their comments have been addressed.
It is unfortunate if BFD WG was not informed of the MPLS WG LC. Updates on
this work had been presented and discussed at BFD WG meetings with the
last presentation
at IETF-92 <>.


On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:58 AM, <> wrote:

> Dear WG,
> This mail closes the 3rd WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed.
> As a result we still do not have consensus to request publication for this
> document and there are a couple of issues which need to be addressed:
>    - We have strong technical comments that need to be resolved, the
>    working group chairs would like to encourage the authors and Carlos to work
>    together to see if it possible to resolve the technical issues. From our
>    understanding this work is already in progress.
>    - Carlos has also pointed out a procedural issue, the document should
>    have been brought to the attention of the bfd WG. We'll make sure that this
>    happens if and when a version that resolve the technical issue mentioned
>    above is posted.
> The earlier IPR issues seems to be resolved.
> Best regards
> Nic