Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis-05.txt

["Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sasha,

Yea, we will mark it as deprecated and replace the references to DDMAP.

Thanks,
Nagendra

On 10/6/15, 5:55 AM, "Alexander Vainshtein"
<[e-mail]> wrote:

>Nagendra,
>Lots of thanks for an excellent summary of expected future work.
>
>One minor comment:
>From my POV the DSMAP TLV should be deprecated (by  the DDMAP one) but
>not removed altogether - in any case this is what RFC 6424 defines.
>
>My 2c,
>Sasha
>
>Office: [phone]
>Cell:      [phone]
>Email:   [e-mail]
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mpls [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Nagendra Kumar
>Nainar (naikumar)
>Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 6:02 PM
>To: [e-mail]
>Cc: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis-05.txt
>
>Hi All,
>
>Uptil this version, all Erratas on RFC4379 has been addressed and text
>were updated to reflect TC instead of EXP (RFC5462).
>
>As mentioned in Section 1.5 of draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis, the next step
>is to evaluate the RFCs that updates RFC4379 and identify the list to be
>incorporated in rfc4379bis.
>
>
>A summary of updates by RFC 6424:
>
>* Updates the validation procedure to include Stitching and Hierarchical
>LSPs.
>* Deprecates DSMAP defined in RFC4379 and replaces it with DDMAP.
>* Introduces a new TLV as FEC Stack Change Sub-TLV
>* Introduces 2 New return codes.
>* Check and include IANA considerations.
>
>Potential Update - Update the return code and DDMAP TLV in respective
>section, Remove (or Deprecate DSMAP), update the procedure with DDMAP
>reference in place of DSMAP, Update the procedure section 4.4, 4.5 and
>4.6.
>
>A summary of updates by RFC 6425:
>
>* Extends the validation procedure for P2MP and MP2MP LSPs.
>* Introduces 4 new Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs.
>* Introduces 2 new TLVs (and related Sub-TLVs)
>* Check and include IANA considerations.
>
>
>Potential Update - Per discussion with WG.
>
>A summary of updates by RFC 6426:
>
>* Extends the validation procedure for MPLS-TP with both IP based and
>non-IP (ACH) based encapsulation .
>* Introduces 2 new Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs.
>* Introduces new Address types for DSMAP
>* Introduces 3 new TLVs.
>* Reserves a flag in Global Flags.
>* Check and include IANA considerations.
>
>
>
>Potential Update - Per discussion with WG.
>
>A summary of updates by RFC 6829:
>
>* Introduces 2 new Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs for PW between IPv6
>endpoints.
>* No changes in procedure.
>* Check and include IANA considerations.
>
>
>
>Potential Update - Include the Sub-TLVs in respective section.
>
>A summary of updates by RFC 7506:
>
>* Introduces a new option in IPv6 HbH extension header.
>* No changes in procedure.
>* Check and include IANA considerations.
>
>
>
>Potential Update - Include the same and update the header processing
>section.
>
>A summary of updates by RFC 7537:
>
>* Document to create IANA registries for name spaces defined in RFC4379
>and 6424.
>* No changes in procedure.
>* Check and include IANA considerations.
>
>
>
>Potential Update - Include the same in IANA consideration.
>
>Since RFC 6829 and 7506 are straight forward, we will go ahead and
>include the same while we discuss on the other RFCs. Please share your
>thoughts and accordingly, we can include the relevant content to update
>the draft.
>
>Thanks,
>Nagendra
>
>
>
>On 10/3/15, 10:19 AM, "[e-mail]"
><[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>
>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>directories.
>>
>>
>>        Title           : Detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS)
>>Data Plane Failures
>>        Authors         : Carlos Pignataro
>>                          Nagendra Kumar
>>                          Sam Aldrin
>>                          Mach(Guoyi) Chen
>>	Filename        : draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis-05.txt
>>	Pages           : 49
>>	Date            : 2015-10-03
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   This document describes a simple and efficient mechanism that can be
>>   used to detect data plane failures in Multi-Protocol Label Switching
>>   (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs).  There are two parts to this
>>   document: information carried in an MPLS "echo request" and "echo
>>   reply" for the purposes of fault detection and isolation, and
>>   mechanisms for reliably sending the echo reply.
>>
>>   This document obsoletes RFC 4379.
>>
>>
>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis/
>>
>>There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis-05
>>
>>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis-05
>>
>>
>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>>tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>I-D-Announce mailing list
>>[e-mail]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls