Re: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sat, 11 February 2017 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCB71297B8; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 05:29:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hQEhYYriS86; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 05:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9381297BC; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 05:29:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1938; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486819775; x=1488029375; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=AaBEKmC7Wty1yCzp/GSfdW9R6nhBuXrquSdNurSXAdI=; b=av045cz7SodaZvsP9zNat57AoMED+r5lR4vSuTownItRCBCzJlwmJTye /sGYy+WNKvA0BDBGj76XpRebcdyEWEs88P/WZCAa1ozJNPrkSvMJapmRG S60rtpyuUhI0lAzeQ6HCDt/sl09TmrRW5W2c8BPYQaPPy7i848UkrxA2U M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B6AQA5EZ9Y/4UNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1KBageDUooIkW8flTaCDIYiAhqCYT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaQEBAQMBIxE3DgUJAgIBCBgCAiYCAgIZFxUQAgQOBYliCLAEgiWLTwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHgWBBoVBggUIgmKEJhEBHBeCby6CMQWVVIYeAZITgXuFF4lzkxQBHzh4CFEVTgGGMXWICYEhgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,146,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="205645655"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Feb 2017 13:29:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1BDTYo1002837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:29:34 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-020.cisco.com (173.36.7.30) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 07:29:34 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-020.cisco.com ([173.36.7.30]) by XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com ([173.36.7.30]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 07:29:34 -0600
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02
Thread-Index: AQHSfpp7jsva65kUME2RMyZZz5c3mqFkPSOA
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:29:34 +0000
Message-ID: <C1D21904-4590-4E96-BFB6-A39923F6D908@cisco.com>
References: <881fae47-dfd0-1cfb-0287-4338a030195c@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <881fae47-dfd0-1cfb-0287-4338a030195c@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.233.89]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9B8D08982BC1DE408E23177AE8C0D977@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1Ay3C3arDtOJ16-oMfVQO2X1aVc>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:29:38 -0000

Hi, Loa,

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:54 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Working Group, authors,
> 
> I had a quick look at  draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02, I have a few
> small nits and questions for the authors.
> 
> 1. FEC is a well know abbreviation in MPLS context, but it is not well-know in wider IETF context. It needs to be expanded at first
> occurrence.

Agreed.

> 
> 2. We have early allocation for this document, can you place the following not in the IANA section in section 10.1.
> 
> "Note to the RFC Editor (please remove before publication): IANA has
> made early allocation for sub-type 34, 35 and 35. The early allocation
> expires 2017-09-15.”

OK.

> 
> And then we create a "#Protocol" sub-registry in  "Multi-Protocol Label
> Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" We will need to define allocation policies and code point range. IMHO the policy
> should be "Standards Action" and the code range 0-255.

This is OK — I would also reserve a couple of values for Experiments.

> 
> And a last question, should BGP-LS be in that registry?
> 

I guess no until someone needs it?

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> /Loa
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64