Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis

[Mach Chen <[e-mail]>]

Same here.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:30 PM
> To: Loa Andersson; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; BRUNGARD,
> DEBORAH A
> Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
> 
> Hi Loa,
> 
> I am not aware of any IPR other than those disclosed as part of RFC4379 or
> drafts merged in this document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nagendra
> 
> On 12/19/15, 12:19 AM, "Loa Andersson" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> >Working Group,
> >
> >The authors of draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis has told us that the
> >document is ready for working adoption.
> >
> >We will do an IPR poll in parallel to the wgap.
> >
> >This mail starts the IPR poll.
> >
> >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis?
> >
> >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> >
> >There are no IPR disclosures filed directly against this document.
> >However, there are  tow IPR disclosures against RFC 4379.
> >
> >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> >this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> >IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> >document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> >received from each author and contributor.
> >
> >If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> >any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> >
> >
> >/Loa
> >mpls wg co-chair
> >--
> >
> >
> >Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> >Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> >Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]