IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Tue, 04 June 2024 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC176C1519AB; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ge_fgsK-99Lh; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBD0C14F6BA; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VtwPl1G7fz6K6Cw; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:03:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.161.198]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76547140A87; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:08:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemf200009.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.246) by lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:08:27 +0100
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.221) by dggpemf200009.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:08:24 +0800
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) by kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:08:24 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: John Drake <je_drake=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
Thread-Index: AQHatiiIbL2kXbzkPE2hd/zXdq/237G28WcQgAAkkwCAALCP2Q==
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 16:08:24 +0000
Message-ID: 3F7173FF-DF98-410D-A868-B12DDD36F4F9
References: <DS0PR19MB65014515D511B396E79BA36FFCF82@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <01ae9f2fff0b44c0affde294398d4bda@huawei.com>,<1117954341.1379670.1717508188522@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1117954341.1379670.1717508188522@mail.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3F7173FFDF98410DA868B12DDD36F4F9_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: RKRTHMHTUUFO7UDISMLTZBQ27ZJ5B7ET
X-Message-ID-Hash: RKRTHMHTUUFO7UDISMLTZBQ27ZJ5B7ET
X-MailFrom: zhoutianran@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>, "Zhukeyi(Kaiyin,Datacom Standard&Patent)" <zhukeyi@huawei.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1cHO59CghwzBkHeXSWnyjxW4q0g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi John,

One packet may need multiple actions/opcodes.
The group format will indicate several actions can share the same metadata.

Tianran


________________________________

Sent from WeLink
发件人： John Drake<je_drake=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:je_drake=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
收件人： Tarek Saad<tsaad.net@gmail.com<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>>;mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>;Tianran Zhou<zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>>
抄送： MPLS Working Chairs<mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>;Zhukeyi(Kaiyin,Datacom Standard&Patent)<zhukeyi@huawei.com<mailto:zhukeyi@huawei.com>>
主题： Re: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
时间： 2024-06-04 21:36:51

So, for what are the post opcode bits in each of the subsequent format C LSEs used?

On Monday, June 3, 2024 at 08:40:12 PM PDT, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:



Hi WG and Authors,



This draft proposed the 4 LSE formats with sequence: A-B-C-D.

I want to propose a new LSE format. Let’s call it C’ temporarily.

C’ is a kind of group, which can group several C formats.

So the sequence is A-B-C’-C-D.



This format can reduce the redundancy of several LSEs.

For example, if several LSEs have the same flow id, we can just put this flow id at the beginning of the group. And all the following LSEs in this group can use.



Best,

Tianran



From: Tarek Saad [mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 10:50 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr



Dear WG,



This email starts a two-week Working Group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr/>.



Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.



Please send your comments to the mpls WG mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).

If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.



Note, currently there are 5 IPR disclosures against this document at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr



This poll runs until June 18, 2024.



Thank you,

Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status