Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 07 July 2022 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D48C14F606; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8ls0c1f2N9H; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294A3C15A73F; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id h17so14102667wrx.0; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=y6JubxcAiaYT2LCf9hO2q25zlZ/UuEf0Ij7rQ+PZAsw=; b=V+lWgx6pS6hba/bNZIl6tPbxyGOayYBpAOlA/j/NFxZOVAg5WnWZICAI8iLpYXm/G9 /6Bjtk8/gar7FEu8R4BL9s8tRZAakCYGjdObGlgEJMtWY94Dbaeug8xog35lhbHI4mYe XiZhFL6NtZDXiZgIwdXogZ/fKSpbUw5VZA+cvbe5/N0MkCXqfBgC/YDHjyHihakVJh0t FvMDHcPGkkDoSq1//RGv3Je5KTXsW/PZeFe18KqtHBSthmeU80o4FdtKp8OLeT+qkk/P C4664dygk/zsOFoe+fkY/imP5tNFab6L8Vo70eV9wfvEydkEbYfyyGCoZlXRErXv88QB eLOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=y6JubxcAiaYT2LCf9hO2q25zlZ/UuEf0Ij7rQ+PZAsw=; b=Cr82XREFRknvyGIwtSgUnoQUnPCT2lfAqOrhQ/aoc1uI6XnlbhyQpK7Fm/ulnRhbSf Q0edCMg8ZeFZeWyZmioRPIDd2vG3pGUhqusOif5QpVBzSQDdKkRS2mMo5tM05mZCjHBv IAOl5Qvej6sIF9dvBC9j7UipmR6TIGZ26aFvvM7rhx8fH8xpdoai4vmq6gBJuoUYEQ0t iNfB4XmlBJAbPLrdcMprjqSNV8RLvPU0Ww8Jme0fSNlUd0+zuB00dDlHEnkQDJw/TlXP fmdeI/AHCzbiRyyaqirzgL9soPVdWs1pcyW99IFNtzOYm1GsV5PWO64zzQLIpRi8686l 5L+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9v9Uahkaa1RpnWvivMe18Jx7jbzRvrKIU8/CEjG5LAuZaCMAO7 5sQ2TxRBBEj+aewl3jX2+cIlrRhqFqc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sUoSPi8SUeqy2XFmh2RQo8oaKdsx14PLHTffCYvwP7xDR4z2jUnrJrGsqqjWTvcB3J9cYE6g==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f84a:0:b0:21d:6e52:7957 with SMTP id d10-20020adff84a000000b0021d6e527957mr18992550wrq.252.1657214325211; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([85.255.237.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o5-20020a056000010500b00210352bf36fsm37508088wrx.33.2022.07.07.10.18.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D812B2AF-DFE4-4641-AE85-9CF5F5B16F65@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D2DE7733-31EA-4187-B295-50AFE792578A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:02:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAPOsKjF-3coMRPTiXxjPVvwAaC6DS76cq5hcyYW0crfzB85xVA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, pals-chairs@ietf.org, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Jaganbabu Rajamanickam <jaganbaburietf@gmail.com>
References: <DD6F1404-4B70-4C83-B468-F08578F72D22@gmail.com> <CAPOsKjF-3coMRPTiXxjPVvwAaC6DS76cq5hcyYW0crfzB85xVA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1qk1P_mJyfZqg41-NyISpcudOnM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 17:18:49 -0000

Thanks

Corrected in my copy of the list

S



> On 7 Jul 2022, at 13:43, Jaganbabu Rajamanickam <jaganbaburietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Stewar,
> 
> 22 pages
> draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr-00 
> MPLS Network Action (MNA) Header Encodings
> 2022-07-06
> 
> 
> The above classification of our draft under ELI/EL is wrong. In our draft we are not using ELI/EL, we are using a new SPL. Please correct it.
> 
> Thanx,
> Jags
> 
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:57 AM Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com <mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Ahead of the call this afternoon I took at the set of MPLS drafts, considering 
> 
> 1) MNA drafts already adopted
> 2) All of the MPLS  individual drafts
> 
> I classified them into:
> 
> 1) Setting the scenes and WIP
> 2) Candidate Solutions
> 3) Drafts concerning the re-use of ELI/EL
> 4) Drafts not related to the MNA discussion
> 
> So first question is whether I have missed any drafts that need to be in one of these lists?
> 
> Second question have I classified them correctly?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Stewart
> 
> 
> Setting the scenes and WIP
>  
> 25 pages
> draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-01 
> Requirements for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data
> 2022-06-21	I-D Exists 
> WG Document		
>  
>  
> 12 pages
> draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases-00 
> Use Cases for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data
> 2022-05-19	I-D Exists 
> WG Document
> 
> 18 pages
> draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04 
> MPLS Network Actions Framework
> 2022-06-27
> New	I-D Exists 
> Call For Adoption By WG Issued : Informational	2	
> Nicolai Leymann 
> 
> 16 pages
> draft-bryant-mpls-dev-primer-02 
> A Primer on the Development of MPLS
> 2022-05-09	I-D Exists		
>  
> 
> Candidate Solutions
>  
> 13 pages
> draft-andersson-mpls-eh-architecture-03 
> MPLS Extension Header Architecture
> 2022-04-05	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 15 pages
> draft-andersson-mpls-eh-label-stack-operations-03 
> MPLS Label Operations in MPLS EH capable networks
> 2022-04-05	I-D Exists		
>  
> 14 pages
> draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-05 
> MPLS Data Plane Encapsulation for In-situ OAM Data
> 2022-07-06
> New	I-D Exists	3	
> 
> 13 pages
> draft-kbbma-mpls-1stnibble-01 
> IANA Registry for the First Nibble Following a Label Stack
> 2022-04-27	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 14 pages
> draft-kompella-mpls-mspl4fa-02 
> Multi-purpose Special Purpose Label for Forwarding Actions
> 2022-02-09	I-D Exists	1	
>  
>  
> 8 pages
> draft-li-mpls-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-02 
> Carrying Virtual Transport Network Identifier in MPLS Packet
> 2022-03-07	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 41 pages
> draft-li-mpls-entropy-01 
> Entropy Values
> 2022-05-12	I-D Exists		
>  
> 
> 6 pages
> draft-liu-mpls-nas-combination-00 
> Combination Method of NASs
> 2022-05-24	I-D Exists		
> 
> 8 pages
> draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk-00 
> Framework of MPLS Reference Augmented Forwarding
> 2022-04-25	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 11 pages
> draft-song-mpls-eh-indicator-05 
> Options for MPLS Extension Header Indicator
> 2022-06-27
> New	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 13 pages
> draft-song-mpls-extension-header-06 
> MPLS Extension Header
> 2022-01-10 
> Expires soon	I-D Exists		
> 
> Reuse of ELI/EL
> 
> 10 pages
> draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-04 
> Using Entropy Label for Network Slice Identification in MPLS networks.
> 2022-06-14	I-D Exists	2	
> 
> 22 pages
> draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr-00 
> MPLS Network Action (MNA) Header Encodings
> 2022-07-06
> New	I-D Exists	2	
>  
> 9 pages
> draft-li-mpls-redefining-eli-00 
> Redefining ELI considered harmful; NPL considered harmful
> 2022-04-07	I-D Exists		
>  
> 
> Not Related to this Discussion
>  
> 14 pages
> draft-gandhi-mpls-stamp-pw-01 
> Encapsulation of Simple TWAMP (STAMP) for Pseudowires in MPLS Networks
> 2022-01-14 
> Expires soon	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 8 pages
> draft-gao-mpls-teas-rsvpte-state-update-04 
> State-updating mechanism in RSVP-TE for MPLS network
> 2022-01-10 
> Expires soon	I-D Exists		
>  
> 7 pages
> draft-liu-mpls-lsp-ping-nrp-00 
> LSP Ping/Traceroute for SR-MPLS NRP SIDs
> 2022-06-13	I-D Exists		
>  
> 13 pages
> draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-03 
> MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency Verification
> 2022-06-11	I-D Exists		
>  
>  
> 38 pages
> draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-02 
> YANG Data Model for MPLS LSP Ping
> 2022-01-28	I-D Exists 
> Candidate for WG Adoption : Proposed Standard		
> Loa Andersson 
>  
>  
> 10 pages
> draft-qu-mpls-mpls-msd-yang-03 
> A YANG Model for MPLS MSD
> 2022-02-02	I-D Exists 
> Candidate for WG Adoption		
>  
>  
> 14 pages
> draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-multi-topology-04 
> mLDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
> 2022-03-07	I-D Exists 
> Candidate for WG Adoption		
> Tarek Saad 
>  
>  
> 17 pages
> draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-04 
> Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for Segment Routing (SR) Path Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes
> 2022-06-21
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>