[mpls] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

[Aijun Wang <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Nic and WG:

 

Although this draft provide one solution to implement the entropy function,
it is not the necessary and killer application for the MNA based solution.

If there is no other prominent function for MNA based architecture, what’s
the reason to design the new architecture?

 

I would like the WG to focus firstly other prominent(if exists) functions
that can utilize/exploit the flexibility of MNA based architecture.

>From the POV of the operator, there is no impetus to put forward such new
knob for the existing function(also considering the existing MPLS entropy
label can fulfill its task perfectly)

 

I suggest the WG to stop adopt it as the WG document, and devote more
energies to others fascinate proposals.

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
代表 [e-mail]
发送时间: 2024年10月1日 22:04
收件人: [e-mail]
抄送: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
主题: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

 

Dear WG,

 

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy as a
MPLS working group document.

 

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working group
mailing list ([e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> ). 

Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially
if you think that the document 

should not be adopted as a working group document.

 

Currently, there are no IPR disclosure against this document. All the
authors/contributors have stated on 

the MPLS WG mailing list that they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs that
relates to this document.

 

This working group adoption poll ends October 16, 2024.

 

Regards,

 

Nic (as MPLS WG co-chair)