IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02

Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Wed, 31 August 2016 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675A012D110; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dd4PBbz-5uo3; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A4F12B053; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-03fff70000005f46-dd-57c67f12332e
Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 85.83.24390.21F76C75; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:54:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:48:04 -0400
From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02
Thread-Index: AdH3ANzPdQ19JyNsQnuCnI2RKyUKQQL0UUkA
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 06:48:04 +0000
Message-ID: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A8A5DF1@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A883507@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A883507@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A8A5DF1eusaamb107erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmplkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonRFe4/li4wYxbPBa7LrBYrLt8is3i 1tKVrA7MHkuW/GQKYIzisklJzcksSy3St0vgyjizYztTwfOQio/Xb7I2MJ707GLk4JAQMJHo 36zRxcjFISSwgVHiy9+lrBDOckaJU8+3MnUxcnKwCWhIHLuzlhHEFhHIl1jybS4LiM0sECJx 9kU7M8ggYYFwiXaYkgiJKQ+Ws0LYRhK3Dt8CK2cRUJVYf3kuWJxXwFfiy8QjYHEhIHvG2xlg qzgF/CQOnjoENodRQEzi+6k1TBCrxCVuPZkPZksICEgs2XOeGcIWlXj5+B8rhK0kMWnpOVaI +nyJab+uM0LsEpQ4OfMJywRGkVlIRs1CUjYLSRlEXEdiwe5PbBC2tsSyha+ZYewzBx4zIYsv YGRfxchRWlyQk5tuZLCJERg5xyTYdHcw3p/ueYhRgINRiYd3wcmj4UKsiWXFlbmHGCU4mJVE eCdXHwsX4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkziv2SDFcSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwBi3 a8MChp3/Ht74e1TtaLjzljqlB7FC75pbrQ0Nrkn4fZgRbK/tz8AirfH9b7b/U+b3szI0r5va +PKcnWeVwv4w/ROXHN+H1NCDHStyp4jkydbmGbYrXyyyDOpqEtfgW2XjlGx8bqnAb7/7Uls8 fSQUr/woWcO471TKZtZ2VYc3XU83PFW9pcRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAJwwQjiYAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1yRPhigTBDzg43oh1fo6e3gzGSA>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 06:48:09 -0000

This WG Last Call is closed; there seemed to be support for - and no objections to - progressing the draft.  I have discussed this with the Working Group Chairs and they agree that there seems to be rough consensus to progress the draft.

Authors, please address the comments made on the mailing list and post a revised version for forwarding by the WG chairs to the IESG.

--
Eric

From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Gray
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:32 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-02


MPLS Working Group,



I am the document shepherd for the following draft:



"MPLS-TP Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology"

(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection  or

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection) - draft

version 02.



This E-Mail is to initiate a two week working group last call on the above draft.



Please send comments to the MPLS working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).



There are IPR disclosures for the individual draft that this document replaced.

They can be found here:



https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection



All the authors and contributors have stated that they are not aware of any

additional IPR related to this draft.



The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked about

working group discussion related to IPR disclosures.



Please remember that discussion on the content and validity of IPR disclosures

should not take place on IETF mailing lists.



However we are looking for simple statements as to whether or not you support

continued working group effort to progress the document, regardless of existing

IPR disclosures.



Please include this information when making comments, or indicating your

"support/do not support" when responding to this working group last call.



Note that the IETF works on the basis of "rough consensus" - hence, unless you

are convinced that a significant number of other participants will have similar

objections, it may be in your best interest to provide any comments you may have

on this Internet Draft, even if you do not support progressing this draft further.



This working group last call ends Monday, August 29, 2016.



--

Eric Gray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email