Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 10 July 2012 12:39 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3985F21F8697 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYjQg028eDIB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F3221F85E4 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B00402A8003; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FFC2297.90108@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:39:51 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <01da01cd5e96$70cab2d0$52601870$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <01da01cd5e96$70cab2d0$52601870$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@cdl.asgaard.org, mpls@ietf.org, lilianyuan@chinamobile.com, 'Fan Peng' <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:39:29 -0000
Working Group, Adrian was quicker than I was on this, just want echo his sentiment. I think that by default the comments should go to the opsawg mailing list - but if you for some reason is not subscribed to that list, send them to the mpls wg list or directly to me and I will forward. /Loa On 2012-07-10 14:20, Adrian Farrel wrote: > I think the MPLS WG should look at this I-D as well. > > Feedback to the authors or on the OPSAWG list, please. > > Adrian > > *From:*opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] *On > Behalf Of *Fan Peng > *Sent:* 10 July 2012 05:52 > *To:* opsawg@ietf.org > *Cc:* ietf@cdl.asgaard.org; lilianyuan@chinamobile.com > *Subject:* [OPSAWG] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission > interruption > > Dear all, > > We have just updated the draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption to > 01 version, and we would like to hear comments from you. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fan-opsawg-transmission-interruption-01 > > We presented the last version in Paris hoping the industry could discuss > the problem of whether the sub-50ms outage time requirement is suitable > for IP/MPLS. We proposed at the meeting two principles for network and > service design, configuration and operation: the IP/MPLS bearer should > satisfy quality requirements of upper level services and applications, > while services and applications should also take into account the > intrinsic IP capabilities. We did analysis on softswitch and reached the > IP interruption requirement of 3 sec. > > In this 01 version we added case of parameter configuration in SS7 > network to illustrate principle 2 (adaptation to IP). We gave examples > on SCTP and M2PA and delivered the concept that upper levels should be > more tolerable to IP best effort to avoid frequent disconnection. > Parameter configuration needs to consider both requirement of > application and nature of IP. Influence on service like SMS is also > involved. > > Any feedback would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks and regards, > > Fan, Peng > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > -- Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 +46 767 72 92 13
- Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS tra… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS tra… Loa Andersson