Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 10 July 2012 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3985F21F8697 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYjQg028eDIB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F3221F85E4 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B00402A8003; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FFC2297.90108@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:39:51 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <01da01cd5e96$70cab2d0$52601870$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <01da01cd5e96$70cab2d0$52601870$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@cdl.asgaard.org, mpls@ietf.org, lilianyuan@chinamobile.com, 'Fan Peng' <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:39:29 -0000

Working Group,

Adrian was quicker than I was on this, just want echo his sentiment.
I think that by default the comments should go to the opsawg mailing
list - but if you for some reason is not subscribed to that list, send
them to the mpls wg list or directly to me and I will forward.

/Loa

On 2012-07-10 14:20, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> I think the MPLS WG should look at this I-D as well.
>
> Feedback to the authors or on the OPSAWG list, please.
>
> Adrian
>
> *From:*opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Fan Peng
> *Sent:* 10 July 2012 05:52
> *To:* opsawg@ietf.org
> *Cc:* ietf@cdl.asgaard.org; lilianyuan@chinamobile.com
> *Subject:* [OPSAWG] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission
> interruption
>
> Dear all,
>
> We have just updated the draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption to
> 01 version, and we would like to hear comments from you.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fan-opsawg-transmission-interruption-01
>
> We presented the last version in Paris hoping the industry could discuss
> the problem of whether the sub-50ms outage time requirement is suitable
> for IP/MPLS. We proposed at the meeting two principles for network and
> service design, configuration and operation: the IP/MPLS bearer should
> satisfy quality requirements of upper level services and applications,
> while services and applications should also take into account the
> intrinsic IP capabilities. We did analysis on softswitch and reached the
> IP interruption requirement of 3 sec.
>
> In this 01 version we added case of parameter configuration in SS7
> network to illustrate principle 2 (adaptation to IP). We gave examples
> on SCTP and M2PA and delivered the concept that upper levels should be
> more tolerable to IP best effort to avoid frequent disconnection.
> Parameter configuration needs to consider both requirement of
> application and nature of IP. Influence on service like SMS is also
> involved.
>
> Any feedback would be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Fan, Peng
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                              +46 767 72 92 13