Re: [mpls] New Version Notification for draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy-00.txt
Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 07 February 2023 06:46 UTC
Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7114C14F74A; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 22:46:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y84eH0ndb7xJ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 22:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A36CC1527AE; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 22:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id a5so7056135pfv.10; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 22:46:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VaszQ5DjKXG4zYukMfdb+ZfIQtPJ9SGGFhMekZg1XWk=; b=oFnnDK74V7A3en0UI+t85UdJcMyw/Rc61gJQCxMhxPa+fhh8MVx7owRpBuXPfTWGsY UHKcv2/g7s8qRf9TE3Qgh1nMLOmv/IqeFMsNlscorwQyuq8a+rlf2LxUS1PTBfdKz+oR AXgIwd7yz5JRADCKQlj1kImYJXz75JIDJZHd6AurZfJsBDXbo2iqiAeCVVzchwscmj8Z HDCszn3Ax/uRuuZft1Kb+sKcaqKjVTlRStavFgOSU4mgUNWOT0MobqjXS0tKMiIslU3Q y0tnec9wMDXFP/p+dRMDScHWZ2uY9kc4JMDeWeF32Rl0zcKc1y+Zy7BmnjkQ4mmwm92P +eVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VaszQ5DjKXG4zYukMfdb+ZfIQtPJ9SGGFhMekZg1XWk=; b=p1nvdoQTYNABzmBJ5pZ0WjYLEORO5BdHeKAPbrvnYk/kUQlm0MtvrXjZTGSfW5uMdO W3+F+pS28FSwnonGsh66PVftT2SSxOlmJBRALMZECpYZY1tlcADgaC9sKVuTnT0sXXPg rwSJKPMFMGdHuIS+XME242gL69C48tCU2MhzbR7regUpWbJZlllCckuFtTiIRhWfbwy8 WCoCtmklknBuuroRSW8BF2D4/BRsjYfFBxddymanjCJExfktmPJa7bR/Nk4GcuGeen+P 2fjdPylzyYf6TLiKqpVpDmhg9R9llcBb8PuvIwME2ZLEFG9HJ+wneUb69BHq2JJFAnua 2+3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWMUXBuLaUVrgWuoaDrFnp4ZV2doHUUHiJDVJQfl/s3S/dWGghx wHWVJbFlygEKpKz60BF0UAOd6ztq69Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+Gi9ct/UihfLF/klw8qWc7jP27GAFXE+rh6K9NUpmSnn0J7LQc2DHZtqGeLK7Ocwk4gZ7aXg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:8412:0:b0:592:b93b:afc0 with SMTP id k18-20020a628412000000b00592b93bafc0mr2420543pfd.20.1675752359648; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 22:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-158-102-25.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.102.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u65-20020a627944000000b0058da56167b7sm8282736pfc.127.2023.02.06.22.45.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2023 22:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.300.101.1.3\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <202302071125088240525@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 22:45:48 -0800
Cc: draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2E89728-AA7F-4E0E-A3AF-C0B7EA4EB635@tony.li>
References: <202302061608518696322@zte.com.cn,> <3406CB51-A701-498E-AA41-7271E91D23C4@tony.li> <202302071125088240525@zte.com.cn>
To: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.300.101.1.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2m7xN600z5Nsjcc7U1vrxL9NXok>
Subject: Re: [mpls] New Version Notification for draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 06:46:02 -0000
Hi Yao, That’s exactly what I’m proposing. T > On Feb 6, 2023, at 7:25 PM, <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn> <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > If the choice is left to the encoding node, for the same network action, i.e, entropy, there may be two different encoding types defined for it? > > Yao > > > ------------------Original------------------ > From: TonyLi <tony.li@tony.li> > To: 刘尧00165286; > Cc: draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org <draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org>;mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>; > Date: 2023年02月07日 01:50 > Subject: Re: [mpls] New Version Notification for draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy-00.txt > > Hi, > I consider encoding efficiency (and thus on-the-wire efficiency) to be paramount. > If an entropy value is to be encoded with a number of other flag based actions, then that might have less overhead. > Alternately, if a smaller entropy value is to be encoded, then it might be more efficient to have that in the same LSE as an opcode. > The choice is left to the node that is encoding the sub-stack. > Tony >> On Feb 6, 2023, at 12:08 AM, liu.yao71@zte.com.cn wrote: >> >> Hi Authors, >> >> In this draft a new opcode is defined for entropy action, considering that both definig new opcode and leveraging opcode 3(Flag-based NA with AD) can carry in-stack NA with data, why the former method is chosen in this draft? >> >> Thanks, >> Yao