[mpls] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-16: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 17 October 2024 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.8.251] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CE0C151717; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 06:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172917071438.1404223.8174624249646832069@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 06:11:54 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: GULS2NEZ5A76STR77H6LZK7BB26RDRIW
X-Message-ID-Hash: GULS2NEZ5A76STR77H6LZK7BB26RDRIW
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, tsaad@cisco.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [mpls] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-16: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2rpiO4Erf6IrXyrf_wHaauvFWR8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Markus Ihlar for his TSVART
review.

It seems the URO defined in RFC7876 is operating according to RFC 8085 (
obsolates RFC 5405 ) - UDP usage guideline. No objection from transport
protocol point of views.