Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 25 May 2015 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D321A879D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2015 18:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4WHrkDbaxPF for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2015 18:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A612C1A87AC for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2015 18:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6702; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432515946; x=1433725546; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=vD29zupFhxuwMB+j1AqK7z0NE1FIxsPykZgBzn/nzOw=; b=BUPTpOmthnTPIYzoRXRgg98cBiZkVaYMN8Wf+gWGVbNHznvmAtqnzIl6 Klkc4p2SrWjzFrcpNn/8BMePc5N24CScH9wIMs+MMQ5/iL+vJcjWBv0bq rDdxAxJlvFl3sHMMMGHAILKt8L/CUyNY/Z2ChhCMpcuhkasVrhwrAvuja 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BzBQBqdGJV/4kNJK1cgxBUXsJDgj4BCYRpgQ4CgSlMAQEBAQEBgQuEIwEBBAEBAWgDCw4CAgEIOwQHGwwLFBECBA4FiCwN0msBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBASLNoQiEQElKAQHgxeBFgWQTII8iw+BKYNxjjyDWSNhgSkcFYE9b4EMgTsBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,488,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="419187665"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 May 2015 01:05:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4P15if9027322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 May 2015 01:05:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.147]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 24 May 2015 20:05:44 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
Thread-Index: AQHQkuMs1UydnVSTWUqL7mKuJxzJ252L6BP/
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 01:05:43 +0000
Message-ID: <60B6FBD5-9354-413B-AC95-2C03407192CD@cisco.com>
References: <555C5A1D.7020709@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <555C5A1D.7020709@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_60B6FBD59354413BAC952C03407192CDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2wOz0kCAZNAj9t-SQbD9zrLJHnQ>
Cc: "draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-ping as an MPLS wg document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 01:05:49 -0000

Hi Loa,

I believe this draft greatly improved based on the MPLS-RT review, and in particular Ron has been extremely responsive to and inclusive of feedback.

I support adoption of this document, and it is useful in its current scope.

I do have a small additional piece of feedback for the author's consideration: currently the doc says something like:

" For example, if a downstream LSR installs a forwarding state that

   causes an LSP to terminate at the wrong node, LSP Self-ping will not

   detect an error."

Could we add a similar applicability hat if an LSP is broken mid stream such that the packet is sent unlabeled, then it won't detect an error?

Thanks!

Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows

On May 20, 2015, at 05:55, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-bonica-mpls-self-
ping-06 as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>). Please give a technical
motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There is one IPR disclosures directly against this document. All the
authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware of
any undisclosed IPRs against this document.

However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose
this is now.

This poll ends June 5, 2015.

/Loa
--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com<mailto:loa@mail01.huawei.com>
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls