Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts
Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Fri, 08 July 2022 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0045FC14CF1B; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZKYGhLffhZHr; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D87C14F747; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id fz10so12078636pjb.2; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=co6YmS6hK7368Qbcf98fRYo3Kdn/BD5LEYjKdZ+SKa0=; b=kn/Zc0mCLhTQW5UOraZQ3T7W9XXPxlJLH5dggPsghMKMhxKCNgRcYCauZCGnzO8+pN bAwKhjSKrquJIWl4aNWxxzFqwzWBx4cjfOulmbUXeza0n7iRtp0sDpzLfXngv0taYfok aZ0knIihZQ4tqVVVqG41u2XmjC/4sff1BbS90cBC3jJgq34RuXrMyFYoTLRCfLpDg9SF wClDQP5TNbZfbKgk6X/yKcMPlGR128fkOWrGaDePQNyvTv8E7vDGewRIWuoeAoJTM0bL Hd7hl9N4ESZxgQcRREbtLxWz9/k8D77cCu1Y7RAohHlNeaKOENwnAvpm0RJFQ8OsiNSj 0AJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=co6YmS6hK7368Qbcf98fRYo3Kdn/BD5LEYjKdZ+SKa0=; b=6jISdb6CaI4Q6ktK0ijEPCxqzXSS9J44UPnLGHi1MsSy8gm+ZE5JxPA313VDdvFPKs XU7wLgqLNAESYqvFhyDScmjpA/p44Pfr4GNH4bmsiU3+9yAFi73b3UaiMQ282JA0r1ko 4bBd3ifpyhpqth3X4Dkv2EqO2PYtlIEzF7jmPjVRF/qjA9zKRnI1OdE0B5fVzWstiCfj 33howm1UR6LZENpQUkTwaGk3apfReAWZgyxwGeNYpYtHocsQKC6x3p8B6mRO+ILj8YV8 +Qhq9etbfGDUMeeZOaCLtUX4m1lWF7giN4KM+HWVC/chPqVmLlgK/JwZ4baSDwZbRM9X jX5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8bxBLu+YKbvc+BAlmBNbe+ymlmwk7TE79P5JfJOWDwiJP1PzC3 I9/IhQRE60262L7IGyhpw/w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uwcu/nKx++QZVwWoct1OLaoYoNRh2mXA1pKSFMZV/ICZF5USNVrjxu8HYvwRQZIEDXvj8PCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3812:b0:1ec:ca8a:f15c with SMTP id mq18-20020a17090b381200b001ecca8af15cmr70798pjb.187.1657290398092; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h14-20020a170902f70e00b0016be14a776asm11482522plo.286.2022.07.08.07.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <876DB026-C176-450D-8FB7-840D9E65EB0D@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F3DCC4A6-164A-4AAF-8C36-9B8261BD9DCF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:36 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnRG=S+FvTViF88=Ute3te6erVNBCzRRm_WDp3juikKQg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, pals-chairs@ietf.org, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
References: <DD6F1404-4B70-4C83-B468-F08578F72D22@gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=hwC2g5NNY5Dc7dbEG-bitru15xWSHfFTpqbe407Nw_g@mail.gmail.com> <6DDB9831-8309-433E-95DE-4EAD2579DD73@tony.li> <CA+b+ERnRG=S+FvTViF88=Ute3te6erVNBCzRRm_WDp3juikKQg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/31TLe1qRD3a9sZrYfdweTv15mpc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:26:40 -0000
Hi Robert, A set of numbers can contain only one element. In fact, most solutions are proposing using only a single sub-stack for the common cases. I don’t think I’ve seen anything that proposes multiple sub-stacks until we start talking about trying to address multiple scopes. Tony > On Jul 8, 2022, at 7:17 AM, Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > > A network action sub-stack can be as small as a single LSE > > Well the framework (as written) does not seem to allow that. > > Note that it says: > > An MNA solution is envisioned as a set of network action sub-stacks, > plus possible post-stack data. > > To me this means plural only. > > Many thx, > R. > > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 16:13, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li <mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > A network action sub-stack can be as small as a single LSE, so your solution is not precluded by the framework draft. > > Your draft has not been ignored. There are many proposed solutions and time has been divided. On the MNA documents taxonomy, your solution rates an entire section. > > Tony > > >> On Jul 8, 2022, at 2:35 AM, Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com <mailto:rraszuk@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Stewart, >> >> Great summary !!! >> >> One comment - if we consider this sentence as definition of MNA from draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04: >> >> 2 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04#section-2>. Structure >> An MNA solution is envisioned as a set of network action sub-stacks, >> plus possible post-stack data. >> >> then my proposal >> >> 8 pages >> draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk-00 >> Framework of MPLS Reference Augmented Forwarding >> 2022-04-25 I-D Exists >> >> is really not a solution document but parallel framework document to accomplish what is listed in MNA >> requirements. The framework document which locks solutions is not proper IMHO. >> >> It is bizarre that MPLS WG chairs have been ignoring draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk completely. >> >> Many thx, >> R/ >> >> >> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 13:57, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com <mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Ahead of the call this afternoon I took at the set of MPLS drafts, considering >> >> 1) MNA drafts already adopted >> 2) All of the MPLS individual drafts >> >> I classified them into: >> >> 1) Setting the scenes and WIP >> 2) Candidate Solutions >> 3) Drafts concerning the re-use of ELI/EL >> 4) Drafts not related to the MNA discussion >> >> So first question is whether I have missed any drafts that need to be in one of these lists? >> >> Second question have I classified them correctly? >> >> Best regards >> >> Stewart >> >> >> Setting the scenes and WIP >> >> 25 pages >> draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-01 >> Requirements for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data >> 2022-06-21 I-D Exists >> WG Document >> >> >> 12 pages >> draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases-00 >> Use Cases for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data >> 2022-05-19 I-D Exists >> WG Document >> >> 18 pages >> draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04 >> MPLS Network Actions Framework >> 2022-06-27 >> New I-D Exists >> Call For Adoption By WG Issued : Informational 2 >> Nicolai Leymann >> >> 16 pages >> draft-bryant-mpls-dev-primer-02 >> A Primer on the Development of MPLS >> 2022-05-09 I-D Exists >> >> >> Candidate Solutions >> >> 13 pages >> draft-andersson-mpls-eh-architecture-03 >> MPLS Extension Header Architecture >> 2022-04-05 I-D Exists >> >> >> 15 pages >> draft-andersson-mpls-eh-label-stack-operations-03 >> MPLS Label Operations in MPLS EH capable networks >> 2022-04-05 I-D Exists >> >> 14 pages >> draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-05 >> MPLS Data Plane Encapsulation for In-situ OAM Data >> 2022-07-06 >> New I-D Exists 3 >> >> 13 pages >> draft-kbbma-mpls-1stnibble-01 >> IANA Registry for the First Nibble Following a Label Stack >> 2022-04-27 I-D Exists >> >> >> 14 pages >> draft-kompella-mpls-mspl4fa-02 >> Multi-purpose Special Purpose Label for Forwarding Actions >> 2022-02-09 I-D Exists 1 >> >> >> 8 pages >> draft-li-mpls-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-02 >> Carrying Virtual Transport Network Identifier in MPLS Packet >> 2022-03-07 I-D Exists >> >> >> 41 pages >> draft-li-mpls-entropy-01 >> Entropy Values >> 2022-05-12 I-D Exists >> >> >> 6 pages >> draft-liu-mpls-nas-combination-00 >> Combination Method of NASs >> 2022-05-24 I-D Exists >> >> 8 pages >> draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk-00 >> Framework of MPLS Reference Augmented Forwarding >> 2022-04-25 I-D Exists >> >> >> 11 pages >> draft-song-mpls-eh-indicator-05 >> Options for MPLS Extension Header Indicator >> 2022-06-27 >> New I-D Exists >> >> >> 13 pages >> draft-song-mpls-extension-header-06 >> MPLS Extension Header >> 2022-01-10 >> Expires soon I-D Exists >> >> Reuse of ELI/EL >> >> 10 pages >> draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-04 >> Using Entropy Label for Network Slice Identification in MPLS networks. >> 2022-06-14 I-D Exists 2 >> >> 22 pages >> draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr-00 >> MPLS Network Action (MNA) Header Encodings >> 2022-07-06 >> New I-D Exists 2 >> >> 9 pages >> draft-li-mpls-redefining-eli-00 >> Redefining ELI considered harmful; NPL considered harmful >> 2022-04-07 I-D Exists >> >> >> Not Related to this Discussion >> >> 14 pages >> draft-gandhi-mpls-stamp-pw-01 >> Encapsulation of Simple TWAMP (STAMP) for Pseudowires in MPLS Networks >> 2022-01-14 >> Expires soon I-D Exists >> >> >> 8 pages >> draft-gao-mpls-teas-rsvpte-state-update-04 >> State-updating mechanism in RSVP-TE for MPLS network >> 2022-01-10 >> Expires soon I-D Exists >> >> 7 pages >> draft-liu-mpls-lsp-ping-nrp-00 >> LSP Ping/Traceroute for SR-MPLS NRP SIDs >> 2022-06-13 I-D Exists >> >> 13 pages >> draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-03 >> MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency Verification >> 2022-06-11 I-D Exists >> >> >> 38 pages >> draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-02 >> YANG Data Model for MPLS LSP Ping >> 2022-01-28 I-D Exists >> Candidate for WG Adoption : Proposed Standard >> Loa Andersson >> >> >> 10 pages >> draft-qu-mpls-mpls-msd-yang-03 >> A YANG Model for MPLS MSD >> 2022-02-02 I-D Exists >> Candidate for WG Adoption >> >> >> 14 pages >> draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-multi-topology-04 >> mLDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing >> 2022-03-07 I-D Exists >> Candidate for WG Adoption >> Tarek Saad >> >> >> 17 pages >> draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-04 >> Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for Segment Routing (SR) Path Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes >> 2022-06-21 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls> >
- [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts Robert Raszuk