Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Fri, 08 July 2022 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0045FC14CF1B; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZKYGhLffhZHr; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D87C14F747; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id fz10so12078636pjb.2; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=co6YmS6hK7368Qbcf98fRYo3Kdn/BD5LEYjKdZ+SKa0=; b=kn/Zc0mCLhTQW5UOraZQ3T7W9XXPxlJLH5dggPsghMKMhxKCNgRcYCauZCGnzO8+pN bAwKhjSKrquJIWl4aNWxxzFqwzWBx4cjfOulmbUXeza0n7iRtp0sDpzLfXngv0taYfok aZ0knIihZQ4tqVVVqG41u2XmjC/4sff1BbS90cBC3jJgq34RuXrMyFYoTLRCfLpDg9SF wClDQP5TNbZfbKgk6X/yKcMPlGR128fkOWrGaDePQNyvTv8E7vDGewRIWuoeAoJTM0bL Hd7hl9N4ESZxgQcRREbtLxWz9/k8D77cCu1Y7RAohHlNeaKOENwnAvpm0RJFQ8OsiNSj 0AJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=co6YmS6hK7368Qbcf98fRYo3Kdn/BD5LEYjKdZ+SKa0=; b=6jISdb6CaI4Q6ktK0ijEPCxqzXSS9J44UPnLGHi1MsSy8gm+ZE5JxPA313VDdvFPKs XU7wLgqLNAESYqvFhyDScmjpA/p44Pfr4GNH4bmsiU3+9yAFi73b3UaiMQ282JA0r1ko 4bBd3ifpyhpqth3X4Dkv2EqO2PYtlIEzF7jmPjVRF/qjA9zKRnI1OdE0B5fVzWstiCfj 33howm1UR6LZENpQUkTwaGk3apfReAWZgyxwGeNYpYtHocsQKC6x3p8B6mRO+ILj8YV8 +Qhq9etbfGDUMeeZOaCLtUX4m1lWF7giN4KM+HWVC/chPqVmLlgK/JwZ4baSDwZbRM9X jX5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8bxBLu+YKbvc+BAlmBNbe+ymlmwk7TE79P5JfJOWDwiJP1PzC3 I9/IhQRE60262L7IGyhpw/w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uwcu/nKx++QZVwWoct1OLaoYoNRh2mXA1pKSFMZV/ICZF5USNVrjxu8HYvwRQZIEDXvj8PCA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3812:b0:1ec:ca8a:f15c with SMTP id mq18-20020a17090b381200b001ecca8af15cmr70798pjb.187.1657290398092; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h14-20020a170902f70e00b0016be14a776asm11482522plo.286.2022.07.08.07.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <876DB026-C176-450D-8FB7-840D9E65EB0D@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F3DCC4A6-164A-4AAF-8C36-9B8261BD9DCF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:26:36 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnRG=S+FvTViF88=Ute3te6erVNBCzRRm_WDp3juikKQg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, pals-chairs@ietf.org, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
References: <DD6F1404-4B70-4C83-B468-F08578F72D22@gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=hwC2g5NNY5Dc7dbEG-bitru15xWSHfFTpqbe407Nw_g@mail.gmail.com> <6DDB9831-8309-433E-95DE-4EAD2579DD73@tony.li> <CA+b+ERnRG=S+FvTViF88=Ute3te6erVNBCzRRm_WDp3juikKQg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/31TLe1qRD3a9sZrYfdweTv15mpc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Taxonomy of MPLS MNA drafts
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:26:40 -0000

Hi Robert,

A set of numbers can contain only one element.  

In fact, most solutions are proposing using only a single sub-stack for the common cases. I don’t think I’ve seen anything that proposes multiple sub-stacks until we start talking about trying to address multiple scopes.

Tony



> On Jul 8, 2022, at 7:17 AM, Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> > A network action sub-stack can be as small as a single LSE
> 
> Well the framework (as written) does not seem to allow that. 
> 
> Note that it says:
> 
> An MNA solution is envisioned as a set of network action sub-stacks,
>    plus possible post-stack data.
> 
> To me this means plural only. 
> 
> Many thx,
> R.
>  
> 
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 16:13, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li <mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
> A network action sub-stack can be as small as a single LSE, so your solution is not precluded by the framework draft.
> 
> Your draft has not been ignored.  There are many proposed solutions and time has been divided.  On the MNA documents taxonomy, your solution rates an entire section.
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
>> On Jul 8, 2022, at 2:35 AM, Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com <mailto:rraszuk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Stewart,
>> 
>> Great summary !!!
>> 
>> One comment - if we consider this sentence as definition of MNA from draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04:
>> 
>>  2 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04#section-2>. Structure
>>    An MNA solution is envisioned as a set of network action sub-stacks,
>>    plus possible post-stack data. 
>> 
>> then my proposal 
>> 
>> 8 pages
>> draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk-00 
>> Framework of MPLS Reference Augmented Forwarding
>> 2022-04-25	I-D Exists	
>> 
>> is really not a solution document but parallel framework document to accomplish what is listed in MNA 
>> requirements. The framework document which locks solutions is not proper IMHO. 
>> 
>> It is bizarre that MPLS WG chairs have been ignoring draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk completely. 
>> 
>> Many thx,
>> R/
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 13:57, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com <mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Ahead of the call this afternoon I took at the set of MPLS drafts, considering 
>> 
>> 1) MNA drafts already adopted
>> 2) All of the MPLS  individual drafts
>> 
>> I classified them into:
>> 
>> 1) Setting the scenes and WIP
>> 2) Candidate Solutions
>> 3) Drafts concerning the re-use of ELI/EL
>> 4) Drafts not related to the MNA discussion
>> 
>> So first question is whether I have missed any drafts that need to be in one of these lists?
>> 
>> Second question have I classified them correctly?
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Stewart
>> 
>> 
>> Setting the scenes and WIP
>>  
>> 25 pages
>> draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-01 
>> Requirements for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data
>> 2022-06-21	I-D Exists 
>> WG Document		
>>  
>>  
>> 12 pages
>> draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases-00 
>> Use Cases for MPLS Network Action Indicators and MPLS Ancillary Data
>> 2022-05-19	I-D Exists 
>> WG Document
>> 
>> 18 pages
>> draft-andersson-mpls-mna-fwk-04 
>> MPLS Network Actions Framework
>> 2022-06-27
>> New	I-D Exists 
>> Call For Adoption By WG Issued : Informational	2	
>> Nicolai Leymann 
>> 
>> 16 pages
>> draft-bryant-mpls-dev-primer-02 
>> A Primer on the Development of MPLS
>> 2022-05-09	I-D Exists		
>>  
>> 
>> Candidate Solutions
>>  
>> 13 pages
>> draft-andersson-mpls-eh-architecture-03 
>> MPLS Extension Header Architecture
>> 2022-04-05	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 15 pages
>> draft-andersson-mpls-eh-label-stack-operations-03 
>> MPLS Label Operations in MPLS EH capable networks
>> 2022-04-05	I-D Exists		
>>  
>> 14 pages
>> draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-05 
>> MPLS Data Plane Encapsulation for In-situ OAM Data
>> 2022-07-06
>> New	I-D Exists	3	
>> 
>> 13 pages
>> draft-kbbma-mpls-1stnibble-01 
>> IANA Registry for the First Nibble Following a Label Stack
>> 2022-04-27	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 14 pages
>> draft-kompella-mpls-mspl4fa-02 
>> Multi-purpose Special Purpose Label for Forwarding Actions
>> 2022-02-09	I-D Exists	1	
>>  
>>  
>> 8 pages
>> draft-li-mpls-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-02 
>> Carrying Virtual Transport Network Identifier in MPLS Packet
>> 2022-03-07	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 41 pages
>> draft-li-mpls-entropy-01 
>> Entropy Values
>> 2022-05-12	I-D Exists		
>>  
>> 
>> 6 pages
>> draft-liu-mpls-nas-combination-00 
>> Combination Method of NASs
>> 2022-05-24	I-D Exists		
>> 
>> 8 pages
>> draft-raszuk-mpls-raf-fwk-00 
>> Framework of MPLS Reference Augmented Forwarding
>> 2022-04-25	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 11 pages
>> draft-song-mpls-eh-indicator-05 
>> Options for MPLS Extension Header Indicator
>> 2022-06-27
>> New	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 13 pages
>> draft-song-mpls-extension-header-06 
>> MPLS Extension Header
>> 2022-01-10 
>> Expires soon	I-D Exists		
>> 
>> Reuse of ELI/EL
>> 
>> 10 pages
>> draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-04 
>> Using Entropy Label for Network Slice Identification in MPLS networks.
>> 2022-06-14	I-D Exists	2	
>> 
>> 22 pages
>> draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr-00 
>> MPLS Network Action (MNA) Header Encodings
>> 2022-07-06
>> New	I-D Exists	2	
>>  
>> 9 pages
>> draft-li-mpls-redefining-eli-00 
>> Redefining ELI considered harmful; NPL considered harmful
>> 2022-04-07	I-D Exists		
>>  
>> 
>> Not Related to this Discussion
>>  
>> 14 pages
>> draft-gandhi-mpls-stamp-pw-01 
>> Encapsulation of Simple TWAMP (STAMP) for Pseudowires in MPLS Networks
>> 2022-01-14 
>> Expires soon	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 8 pages
>> draft-gao-mpls-teas-rsvpte-state-update-04 
>> State-updating mechanism in RSVP-TE for MPLS network
>> 2022-01-10 
>> Expires soon	I-D Exists		
>>  
>> 7 pages
>> draft-liu-mpls-lsp-ping-nrp-00 
>> LSP Ping/Traceroute for SR-MPLS NRP SIDs
>> 2022-06-13	I-D Exists		
>>  
>> 13 pages
>> draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-03 
>> MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency Verification
>> 2022-06-11	I-D Exists		
>>  
>>  
>> 38 pages
>> draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-02 
>> YANG Data Model for MPLS LSP Ping
>> 2022-01-28	I-D Exists 
>> Candidate for WG Adoption : Proposed Standard		
>> Loa Andersson 
>>  
>>  
>> 10 pages
>> draft-qu-mpls-mpls-msd-yang-03 
>> A YANG Model for MPLS MSD
>> 2022-02-02	I-D Exists 
>> Candidate for WG Adoption		
>>  
>>  
>> 14 pages
>> draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-multi-topology-04 
>> mLDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
>> 2022-03-07	I-D Exists 
>> Candidate for WG Adoption		
>> Tarek Saad 
>>  
>>  
>> 17 pages
>> draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-04 
>> Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for Segment Routing (SR) Path Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with MPLS Data Planes
>> 2022-06-21
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>
>