IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid

"高星(联通集团本部)" <gaox60@chinaunicom.cn> Mon, 19 August 2024 09:08 UTC

Return-Path: <gaox60@chinaunicom.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA6AC14F5E7; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fe8ATfLH7mKh; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sendd.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendb.mailex.chinaunicom.cn [123.138.59.137]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D4ADC151086; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M10-XA-MLCEN02.MailSrv.cnc.intra (unknown [10.236.3.198]) by sendd.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4WnRZl2ypmzmMvdq; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:07:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from smtpbg.qq.com (10.237.2.99) by M10-XA-MLCEN02.MailSrv.cnc.intra (10.236.3.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.48; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:07:57 +0800
X-QQ-mid: Ymail-xx24b003-t1724058474tch
Received: from DESKTOP-OLBFPM0 (unknown [10.172.156.182]) by smtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:07:53 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 01900000000000E0N610000A0000000
X-QQ-GoodBg: 0
From: "高星(联通集团本部)" <gaox60@chinaunicom.cn>
To: "tsaad.net" <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:07:53 +0800
References: <DS0PR19MB6501543F9BEAACDEA944610DFCBF2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.23.121[cn]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202408191707530282041@chinaunicom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart312523336087_=----"
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: Ymail-xx:chinaunicom.cn:mail-xx:mail-xx24b003-zhyw47w
Message-ID-Hash: V6V2RZKMLN56XOABCTU34BUOBNIXBBUT
X-Message-ID-Hash: V6V2RZKMLN56XOABCTU34BUOBNIXBBUT
X-MailFrom: gaox60@chinaunicom.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping- path-sid@ietf.org" <draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/GR9yzXIS0sVpNRGmVfU-s46oWPI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi WG,
I have read the document and I support the progression to RFC.

Best regards,
Gao xing.

________________________________


From: Tarek Saad<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-08-06 21:53
To: mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
CC: MPLS Working Chairs<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org<mailto:draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid
Dear WG,

This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-09>.

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.

Note, currently there are no IPR disclosures<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid> against this document.

This poll runs until August 20, 2024.

Thank you,
Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)

如果您错误接收了该邮件，请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到 hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn，即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn ,you can unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from send catalogue of our.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status