Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 04 February 2013 10:26 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE86921F85CC for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smj+I9BckTm7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (unknown [195.206.248.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9079021F85B1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12DDF7FE07; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:26:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <510F8CB9.9030104@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:26:01 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)" <mkonstan@cisco.com>
References: <OF680CC542.E612C987-ON48257AF0.0054B98D-48257AF0.00565224@zte.com.cn> <96EE5A5F6E4E6448B2AC953A71A9739B1134BAF9@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <96EE5A5F6E4E6448B2AC953A71A9739B1134BAF9@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "<draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod@tools.ietf.org>, lizho.jin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:26:06 -0000
Maciek and authors, I've taken a look at issues around standards track and updating RFC5036. I've also consulted a bit with our AD. There are two issues: Updating RFC5036 ---------------- I've always thought your Internet Draft does not update RFC5036, but it is a bit unclear- There is a paragraph in your ID that says: Label Distribution Protocol is specified in [RFC5036], and all LDP Downstream-on-Demand implementations MUST follow this specification. I've always read this as that "...all LDP DoD implementations must follow RFC5036". And I think that is what you intend to say. However if the intention is to say "...all LDP DoD implementations must follow draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod", we have a clear update and you need to make this clear in your draft. As a consequence the draft need to be on the standards track, you need to mention the update in the abstract and introduction and update meta data. Can you please re-write the paragraph above to make this clear. Standards track or Informational -------------------------------- This is much clearer - the fact that you define a new TLV makes this Standards Track. You'll have to update this. /Loa On 2013-02-02 21:20, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) wrote: > Lizhong, > > Many thanks for your review. > > We have modified the text of the draft to reflect your suggestions. Will > publish updated version shortly. > Pls let us know if any further comments. > > More inline [mk] > > Thanks, > Maciek. > > e: maciek@cisco.com <mailto:maciek@cisco.com> > > > > > On 11 Jan 2013, at 15:42, Lizhong Jin wrote: > >> >> Hi Loa, >> I review this draft, and overall, it is well written. And I have >> following comments: >> 1. there is protocol extention in this draft. Should it be standard >> track instead of information? > > [mk] We consider the proposed LDP TLV extension as minor. Let the WG > decide if this warrants changing the status to standard track. > >> 2. section 3, it says this draft will be updated once >> [I-D.ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6] is advanced. Does that mean this last call >> should be after [I-D.ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6], or should we just remove >> this sentance? > > [mk] New text: > > This document is focusing on IPv4 LDP DoD procedures. Similar > procedures will apply to IPv6 LDP DoD [I-D.ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6]. > >> 3. section 3.1.1, it says: >> Downstream AN/AGN1x should respond to the label request from the >> upstream AN/AGN1x with a label mapping (if requested route is present >> in its RIB, and there is a valid label binding from its downstream) >> I think more acurate saying of the last sentance would be "if >> requested route is present in its RIB, and there is a valid label >> binding from its downstream or it is the egress node". > > [mk] New text: > > Downstream AN/AGN1x should respond to the label request from the > upstream AN/AGN1x with a label mapping if requested route is present > in its RIB, and there is a valid label binding from its downstream or > it is the egress node. > >> >> Thanks >> Lizhong >> >> >> > ------------------------------ >> > >> > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:25:44 +0100 >> > From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> >> > To: "mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org >> <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>> >> > Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" >> <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>, >> > "<draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod@tools.ietf.org >> <mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod@tools.ietf.org>>" >> > <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod@tools.ietf.org >> <mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod@tools.ietf.org>> >> > Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod >> > Message-ID: <50D17A08.8050109@pi.nu <mailto:50D17A08.8050109@pi.nu>> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> > >> > >> > Working Group, >> > >> > This is to start a working group last call on >> > draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-03. This working last call is extended >> > due to the upcoming holidays. >> > >> > Please send your comments to the mpls working group mailing >> > list (mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>). >> > >> > Please send both technical comments, and if you are happy with the >> > document as is also indications of support. >> > >> > There are no IPR claims against this draft. >> > >> > All the co-authors has stated that they are not ware of any IPRs. >> > >> > This working group last call will end on January 15, 2013. >> > >> > /Loa >> > for the wg co-chairs >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > Loa Andersson email: >> loa.andersson@ericsson.com <mailto:loa.andersson@ericsson.com> >> > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu> >> > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 >> > +46 767 72 92 13 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consult) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Thomas.Beckhaus
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… N.Leymann
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Uwe.Joorde
- [mpls] Closed - Working Group Last Call on draft-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-… Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)