Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument

Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <davari@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD471A6F2E; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4ljxYJvvaI0; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com (mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com [216.31.210.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED651A6F2D; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,617,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="76524256"
Received: from irvexchcas06.broadcom.com (HELO IRVEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com) ([10.9.208.53]) by mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2015 07:33:32 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.14) by IRVEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.208.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:06:30 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([fe80::bc15:c1e1:c29a:36f7]) by SJEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:06:30 -0700
From: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
Thread-Index: AQHQ/EzvUDMYkZqn00iPlN0oZIhCn55WrCLV
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:06:29 +0000
Message-ID: <7C5724FE-716A-45B6-ACD3-4690B0797E9C@broadcom.com>
References: <mailman.138.1443452463.3777.mpls@ietf.org>, <91E3A1BD737FDF4FA14118387FF6766B155C666A@lhreml504-mbs>
In-Reply-To: <91E3A1BD737FDF4FA14118387FF6766B155C666A@lhreml504-mbs>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/3FgXPB5zIw2ELplR9jKUBF-dZOY>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:06:44 -0000

I also Support this draft. Nicely done with almost no configuration.

Regards,
Shahram


> On Oct 1, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, support
> 
> Italo
> 
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:07:20 +0800
>> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
>> To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>rg>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org"
>>    <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org"
>>    <draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
>>    draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
>> Message-ID: <56091F68.8050000@pi.nu>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>> 
>> Working Group,
>> 
>> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-02
>> as an MPLS working group document.
>> 
>> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation
>> for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document
>> should not be adopted as a working group document.
>> 
>> There is currently one IPR disclosure against this document. All the
>> authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware
>> of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this draft..
>> 
>> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware
>> of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now.
>> 
>> This poll ends October 12, 2015.
>> 
>> /Loa
>> mpls wg co-chair
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:29:54 +0000
>> From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
>> To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>rg>,
>>    "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>rg>,
>>    "draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-kompella-mpls-
>> rmr@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
>>    draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
>> Message-ID:
>>    <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112218E5ECE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> 
>> yes/support
>> 
>>    Regards,
>>        Greg
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
>> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:07 AM
>> To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-kompella-mpls-
>> rmr@ietf.org
>> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-
>> kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
>> 
>> Working Group,
>> 
>> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-02
>> as an MPLS working group document.
>> 
>> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation
>> for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document
>> should not be adopted as a working group document.
>> 
>> There is currently one IPR disclosure against this document. All the
>> authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware
>> of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this draft..
>> 
>> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware
>> of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now.
>> 
>> This poll ends October 12, 2015.
>> 
>> /Loa
>> mpls wg co-chair
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:45:14 -0700
>> From: "Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
>> To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org,
>>    mpls-chairs@ietf.org
>> Subject: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
>>    draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
>> Message-ID: <20150928144514.27528.79571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
>> criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thanks for your work on this draft.  The security review from 6 months
>> ago hasn't been fully addressed in the draft and I think it would be
>> helpful to do so.  There were responses given on list, but
>> corresponding updates didn't happen for all of the comments.
>> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05301.html
>> 
>> For the first comment, the response was that this mechanism does not
>> deprecate use of "Echo Reply".  The language in the first paragraph of
>> section 3 should be made clear on that point.
>> 
>> For the second comment:
>>    s4.1: Is the outermost label allowed to be set to 255 to support
>> the
>>    ?ping? mode or must it always be set to 1, 2, etc. to
>> support ?traceroute"
>>    mode - as described in RFC 4379 s4.3?   I know s5 is just an
>> example
>>    but it really looks like this extension is just supposed to be for
>> fault
>>    isolation.
>> 
>> The response via email says it is possible to set it to 255, could this
>> be made clear in the draft?
>> 
>> The third comment was addressed, thank you.
>> 
>> It was also good to see the security considerations cover path
>> discovery as well as DoS related attacks.  Thanks for that!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:55:10 -0700
>> From: "Alia Atlas" <akatlas@gmail.com>
>> To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: mpls@ietf.org,
>>    draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple.shepherd@ietf.org,
>>    mpls-chairs@ietf.org,
>>    draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple@ietf.org,
>>    draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple.ad@ietf.org,
>>    rcallon@juniper.net
>> Subject: [mpls] Alia Atlas' Yes on
>>    draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-04: (with COMMENT)
>> Message-ID: <20150928145510.31971.547.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-04: Yes
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
>> criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-
>> simple/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 1) Bottom of page 7:  Please describe the meaning of the length field
>> in the TLV and whether there is any padding.  Alternately (or as well)
>> - give a reference that defines these details.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:57:10 -0400
>> From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
>> To: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>rg>, "mpls@ietf.org"
>>    <mpls@ietf.org>rg>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-
>> reply.all@ietf.org,
>>    IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>rg>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-
>> dir@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call:
>>    <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply
>>    mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
>> Message-ID:
>>    <CAA=duU30D_YoHHx3DWEQBS-
>> 7ZnDfWmF=oEt4v43QSNQNdhS2vA@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> Lizhong,
>> 
>> [Lizhong] I proposed to add the following, and waiting for his
>> confirmation.
>>> This stack grows downward, with relay node addresses further along
>> the
>>> LSP appearing lower down in the stack. Please refer to section 4.2
>> for
>>> the relay node discovery mechanism.
>> 
>> If this is acceptable to Joel, I'm good with it as well.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/attachments/20150928/e15
>> aedbc/attachment.html>
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:00:40 -0400
>> From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
>> To: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>rg>, "mpls@ietf.org"
>>    <mpls@ietf.org>rg>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-
>> reply.all@ietf.org,
>>    IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>rg>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-
>> dir@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call:
>>    <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply
>>    mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
>> Message-ID:
>>    <CAA=duU1z+hLZ759TJtjRZOK0s8OsajHcLdzQ0Z-
>> OfKvFgrD_QQ@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> Lizhong,
>> 
>> Responding to myself, I just saw Joel's email, so we're both good with
>> this addition.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Lizhong,
>>> 
>>> [Lizhong] I proposed to add the following, and waiting for his
>>>> confirmation.
>>>> This stack grows downward, with relay node addresses further along
>>>> the LSP appearing lower down in the stack. Please refer to section
>>>> 4.2 for the relay node discovery mechanism.
>>> 
>>> If this is acceptable to Joel, I'm good with it as well.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andy
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/attachments/20150928/d19
>> 42cb3/attachment.html>
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> End of mpls Digest, Vol 137, Issue 54
>> *************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls