Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf

Ross Callon <> Mon, 06 April 2015 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B670A1ACE7C for <>; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 17:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sDYI0qnEYh7a for <>; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 17:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89CDB1ACE75 for <>; Sun, 5 Apr 2015 17:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 00:10:30 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0125.002; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 00:10:29 +0000
From: Ross Callon <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf
Thread-Index: AQHQb/4XUj4KO1FX70O31W+6j8Sx3A==
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:10:29 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429;
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(164054003)(377454003)(46102003)(74316001)(66066001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(19609705001)(102836002)(2501003)(18717965001)(40100003)(122556002)(15975445007)(86362001)(99286002)(76576001)(77156002)(62966003)(19300405004)(50986999)(2656002)(19625215002)(76176999)(230783001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(87936001)(16236675004)(106116001)(54356999)(92566002)(110136001)(2351001)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429;; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1429;
x-forefront-prvs: 0538A71254
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY1PR0501MB14307B7B5965125211314F1FA5FE0BY1PR0501MB1430_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Apr 2015 00:10:29.7367 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1429
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Ross Callon <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:10:33 -0000

This working group last call has now ended.

There was one public response (to the MPLS working group) in support. I also got private responses of support from two of the authors. Otherwise there were no responses (neither in favor nor opposed). This is not sufficient to constitute "rough consensus". As such the working group last call has failed.

My inclination is to wait for the July IETF (in Prague), and give the authors an opportunity to present and solicit additional support. Depending upon the response there, we may then repeat the WGLC.

Thanks, Ross
(as WG co-chair)

From: mpls [] On Behalf Of Ross Callon
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:46 PM
Subject: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf

Working Group,

This is to initiate a working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-09.
Because this WGLC will span the IETF in Dallas, it will be extended to just over three weeks.

Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (<>).

There are no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors have stated that they
are not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft (two of the responses were private to
the WG chairs).

This working group last call ends Thursday  April 2, 2015.

for the MPLS WG chairs