From nobody Mon Dec 27 17:31:23 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1473A0781; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:31:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CALzEPj7NrP9; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5AC3A0780; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id o20so67718978eds.10; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:31:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mB2GGG1ZjsNk+xYxH6zeEUbAN0m29cjtL6GesP6wGmo=; b=UxBaFtSRmZVhfYgO2qgWsl66nZybRQbjbhkgdkh87ghp3Wd5WZOwFPsN7m6xYI92bF NN+c63F0itxVGMXQPDU9KmH/GGVeGJd3tAs/O5kedKI64PpmN6MjGlKuMhRin9bd8Y7s Kd2qNQcXpP9B4AeGLIk6uyMn0UTmyvB4MhePh4DiI/KUsm558b3riwQdGGlAByr96YgB uMYoDJPKxDi/QiRoDftiJxfj3Dj8y6zn6Ps7H9mN5f11xcYWRFIoEyFmei2nl4dy8M2G JZBWzMCcOs5HPiKNSKRIeCEX08IGeLz4g1yXKtKvs9AhU4C4/4sDzIVf+2g6k4Rf7Hak dCpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mB2GGG1ZjsNk+xYxH6zeEUbAN0m29cjtL6GesP6wGmo=; b=o5RwbXbj09fUR47M8V3zPMrnCyKQ9yp/mfRxyE0aavK/90OkfuxHrq9p+uzoOZxAIr mM8iNiY6QwjoKNyrEDo18986PAbEmpNCmNMM/kEGw/iiZhMwqLCyKcfX+PMPd60jpShS z73Rb7xmVyFAnIkIoXW5p3c1AvvMqtQMmmXLV6uiEkIr2n5VTiOg20aIHTrz+kPD1qWF NvlYFG8ZhFLgASty9AzeLGEl/7Fl77mY8TJZBbcP9JIh03FEHLzU4s8eubVafCQ2afmo FnCIjtzTOka45WIpb+qT3aV2QrQnmqSsgBRVJJ/pZ2S+YpeEd5nh1IHxlr2Q0f1bDKRt oPsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mZZP65Z8e+T16kN6J6t1ITf1wyb4/NHPsDIjTpVi7lR9iYoPC HfEmIulxyUrib3TECmOWA3Qp8hfuEhxPfHJodps= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyThsLPFnYUYoycK3X5tP6IMcTgp0DiqUmRhALp/S8cyI1ZcNpcS5GD5xR3DOp6hWaYjH5H/jQ+aCA5a10dalk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:390:: with SMTP id o16mr18123575edv.78.1640655076911; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:31:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <198DFF50-B9C6-4719-A16D-DDECE9C28770@gmail.com> <8685AC53-75DC-4278-B76B-3A8C902B2C70@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8685AC53-75DC-4278-B76B-3A8C902B2C70@gmail.com> From: Xufeng Liu Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 20:31:05 -0500 Message-ID: To: Kireeti Kompella Cc: Tarek Saad , mpls , "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" , "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" , "draft-kompella-mpls-larp@ietf.org" , Reji Thomas Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000eebbc05d42ac798" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT for draft-kompella-mpls-larp X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 01:31:21 -0000 --0000000000000eebbc05d42ac798 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kireeti, The updates in version -11 look good. The proposed future updates will also be great. Thanks, - Xufeng On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:48 PM Kireeti Kompella wrote: > Hi Xufeng, > > On Dec 13, 2021, at 18:36, Kireeti Kompella > wrote: > > > > 4. In Figure 3. of Sec 5.1., there is =E2=80=9C ... (3 octets)=E2=80=9D. = Should it be =E2=80=9C2 > octets=E2=80=9D here? Also, if these 2 octets are not used, why 6 is chos= en as the > hardware address length? > > > 3 octets (clarified). > > > Balaji (a co-author) pointed out that BGP-LS uses 4 bytes for metrics. A > future version of the draft will update this. > > Cheers, > Kireeti. > > --0000000000000eebbc05d42ac798 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Kireeti,

The updates in v= ersion -11 look good. The proposed future updates will also be great.
=
Thanks,
- Xufeng

On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:48 PM Kireeti= Kompella <kireeti.ietf@gmail.= com> wrote:
Hi Xufeng,

On Dec 13, 2021, at 18:36, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.ietf@gmail= .com> wrote:

<snipped>

4. In Figure 3. of Sec 5.1., there is =E2=80=9C ...= (3 octets)=E2=80=9D. Should it be =E2=80=9C2 octets=E2=80=9D here? Also, i= f these 2 octets are not used, why 6 is chosen as the hardware address leng= th?


3 octets (clarified).

<= div>Balaji (a co-author) pointed out that BGP-LS uses 4 bytes for metrics.= =C2=A0 A future version of the draft will update this.

=
Cheers,
Kireeti.

--0000000000000eebbc05d42ac798--