Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92633A041D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=c8xt7NHf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=XStXhvgL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tN4bYfV0ezdP for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21BC3A00C0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14103; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1591712091; x=1592921691; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=MH/oOxK0lXX1GBSxdegMpeca4Hh6Pq82DBvdt4rnc2M=; b=c8xt7NHfieIujayUFjhmxS4r+vckYLgZm/f6EUk0n4+bg6ZgQn4OCTF2 uvFHhg8MQPWqOg2n0BM/UI8W1hgkLygmqkXxy/xQ2H4flNJDMcNTv2O68 K24uZdqhdfV7U//lO0GojbVrI6+AYyunJBHW1g+AYf+TX/DJEne+wyelC s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ABwH+DRZ296+l5m+10KYvhA3/LSx94ef9IxIV55?= =?us-ascii?q?w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QaVD4re4vNAzeHRtvOoVW8B5MOHt3YPONxJWg?= =?us-ascii?q?QegMob1wonHIaeCEL9IfKrCk5yHMlLWFJ/uX3uN09TFZXxYlTTpju56jtBUh?= =?us-ascii?q?n6PBB+c+LyHIOahs+r1ue0rpvUZQgAhDe0bb5oahusqgCEvcgNiowkIaE0mR?= =?us-ascii?q?Y=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CwAABdmN9e/4cNJK1mGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEDAQEBARIBAQEBAgIBAQEBggqBIy9SB29YLywKhBqDRgONP4JphxaJa4R?= =?us-ascii?q?ogUKBEANVCwEBAQwBASMKAgQBAYREAheBfgIkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgR?= =?us-ascii?q?thVsMhXIBAQEBAgESER0BASkOAQ0CAgEIDgMDAQIBJwMCAgIZBhETAQkIAgQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BDQUigwQBgX5NAw4gAQ6lYAKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWFRg0Lgg4DBgWBM4JkiW8?= =?us-ascii?q?aggCBEAEnHIJNPoEEgRqBahEBEgEnEQkGBwmCXjOCLYw5CIJEJ4JnhjKDA5g?= =?us-ascii?q?KTAqCWZQoBoRfAx2CbYkTklKRDIFiinaRRQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaiJmcHAVGks?= =?us-ascii?q?Bgj5QFwINkEAYg1qFFIVCdDcCBggBAQMJfI4FAYEPAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,492,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="507900759"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Jun 2020 14:14:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 059EEoTn025599 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:14:50 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:14:50 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:14:49 -0400
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:14:49 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Y0rqv8RyiQbI1itnWYDS7R85MY1CX4hQGz+VOX0cVyNkxG2C+d0+EdpSLb51o7A1m9QlWy1BsT5O3DysvqILrF+ukAIdqEGw+Z32DbMWiBfwdC2CiePcSr6drkr3woDkZ3ikscXIdiy95iJCGk6n/iEpNmbw8/GYRohYrZY/3Qscymddkm4BTSv6R/6PtK7aK5/GWLrrjDjOEUz/S5t5id7l08jiQptiEaKfEZn/rLvQgB0l9KlKKKqJdj81yCyz0CtwIrXL8OpLoZn3R2vC42yK+sC2RKbzpfuz9I9xfyf2UYQHfWvRkuThT9ibFbnb8ZZixPpSMnGO+3zxyAciYA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MH/oOxK0lXX1GBSxdegMpeca4Hh6Pq82DBvdt4rnc2M=; b=TnNhQ8wJrXyBjhqlLFjSGadaP++9XCzWeyiNwh+6auHu6I28wKT8jIDdCzwA7QD2O4Va0oAyJUvs9w6Uy6nyyGpRjAmo3u/XlfWlbYLP+bGh7/5tp7cpz8nWwO1AmPMLifiKKW4RNFLTTvy3Q8o/QnhAaTkGecynJeODNj23l2S05ZHCEc4ZhUFgr003Od2qE2f0/dEf1nVKdpA9Wz0rE+F2gKvz1QNbxyglJ5DEj4Kwl9sQtqIZnaVuAYu7/CQniBIlXH9XK+IjQr+S8ugH31JPJ6oYSmLkN8OdUmVUtlJZ0Q5W5z1H8sc1KYTa6QuQ+limYDUuf+bHgIniZ6QAIA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MH/oOxK0lXX1GBSxdegMpeca4Hh6Pq82DBvdt4rnc2M=; b=XStXhvgLGckEEGSwnvpqZ/ZqQORgtH3QUMcM+WdDy/SIMM1n98vX/80JTpQIDA1zYTQQanp6k9YwhKCT3rB6xgddOUX7qg+qO+DQSE9jGwtb6nMazZIsbe05sNtv5Mi7lMrmiHcxcovC5bt4SZgn0Ycq+rG8uRMFqSAKkt2G3oI=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BYAPR11MB3783.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:f5::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3088.18; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:14:47 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4950:e26c:503f:768e]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4950:e26c:503f:768e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3066.023; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:14:41 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com" <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
Thread-Index: AQHWOZCmfietepCl1kSVkW61c0FwPKjQI9sAgAAmkID//9AFgA==
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:14:41 +0000
Message-ID: <98D20EBF-C509-4AFE-B4CD-4079D4AA9C60@cisco.com>
References: <20200603102000.31C90F40751@rfc-editor.org> <25ca1341-454d-854e-8724-f60df98c0bdb@pi.nu> <CAG4d1rfLGzNNF9z+pf8tQ7tXkJDT-_+ZFnL_G95gwZzJo=gsPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rfLGzNNF9z+pf8tQ7tXkJDT-_+ZFnL_G95gwZzJo=gsPg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ede7ddde-e951-4112-5f8a-08d80c7f73d3
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3783:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3783E4CD538EC1CF4FE09A65C2820@BYAPR11MB3783.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 042957ACD7
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2kiek1IiHZiewLG/iShkeI1Fw/D9wdsOhgL+r6mVuLHoG/yjTnP0DGY432SciB4UDe2H8icO2iE0fzb+g4WD6TUnXBoHdiAbrQyWvwDqrmlwenGg/Y3R7Yk4Pf5zRirJWhzd8v3116e6Ku3WI7astfbmHrOqtW16PQWrPVMKcOijdsOdg4e97tmz/qpuWZ5dDaOqF9uP4t4gk2mEZB1APpj3/F33zmqaLVlLzCI5eQRuc8jmFfqEJDI5ToLI4HtOaF/5GtRAQjXa+1XjZoUyfEUcS+JjxOBS75RrfuXFAj1XA5c7mtJeKJGau3gCajqLo8Lcr797Uut2SUxaQQ88CsBYydm75trcnSEWrlSLdJ60sCiG8EJ/Xy42mQsoppMUfjf62HU3Zh75lNBtfTsvdQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(2616005)(478600001)(8936002)(5660300002)(86362001)(4326008)(316002)(33656002)(26005)(6512007)(110136005)(53546011)(966005)(166002)(54906003)(186003)(6506007)(36756003)(2906002)(66476007)(66946007)(66446008)(66556008)(64756008)(6486002)(76116006)(83380400001)(8676002)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_98D20EBFC5094AFEB4CD4079D4AA9C60ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ede7ddde-e951-4112-5f8a-08d80c7f73d3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jun 2020 14:14:41.5657 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: OByA8a9W+VZdJdgXDX08lRQ9j6tIbvygThDhIBvO1lF6XF9eeyFCPmmAdq2n+lbY
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3783
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/4KTa9XXEv6E0CPyXfRN9KkY4mmk>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:14:54 -0000

Is there an IETF policy for adding/correcting normative language via an Errata? I guess this is allowed.
Thanks,
Acee

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>rg>, "mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com" <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>om>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)

Sure

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:48 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
All,

I think this errata in essence is correct, though I would want to
propose a slight modification to the Corrected Text.

On 03/06/2020 18:20, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4090,
> "Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6203
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Mihir Amrelia <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com<mailto:mihiramrelia_89@yahoo..com>>
>
> Section: 6
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> If the "bandwidth protection guaranteed" flag is set, the PLR SHOULD try to
> provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR SHOULD then try
> to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.
>
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> If the "Bandwidth Protection Desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE, the PLR
> SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR
> SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.
>
>

Slightly Corrected Text
--------------
If the "bandwidth protection desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE,
the PLR
SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible,
the PLR
SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full
bandwidth.

Note 1: lowercase is how the document treat all othr names of flags in
flowing text.

Note 2: with this slight change I think this Errata could be verified
and held for a document update.

/Loa

>
> Notes
> -----
> Correcting flag info to consider bandwidth protection.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4090 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels
> Publication Date    : May 2005
> Author(s)           : P. Pan, Ed., G. Swallow, Ed., A. Atlas, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

--

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64