Re: [mpls] New Draft Notification: draft-dong-mpls-rsvp-te-plr-designation-00

Hi,
This draft is good in selecting the PLRs in the initial LSP setup itself.
But can this draft handle the dynamic PLR node change?
Do you have any thought on constrcuting the new TLVs to send the new EROs in
the established LSP to indicate the new PLR nodes?

Do you really think that administrator should know about all the transit
nodes of the LSP? I think, this is possible with the help of CSPF but
collecting the informations about transit node's resources and other
informations may be tough.

Thanks,
Venkat.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Jie Dong <dongjie_dj@huawei.com> wrote:

>
> Dear all,
>
> We have submitted a new internet draft "Designation of PLRs in RSVP-TE Fast
> Reroute"
>
> The URL is:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-mpls-rsvp-te-plr-designation-00
>
> The abstract is as follows:
>
> This document defines RSVP-TE extensions which enable the ingress node to
> designate particular LSRs along the path as Points of Local Repair (PLRs)
> of
> the protected LSP, and further indicate the protection type of each PLR.
> These mechanisms could enhance the control over the establishment of backup
> LSPs, and also could save the resources needed for establishing and
> maintaining unnecessary backup LSPs.
>
> Any comments and suggestions are appreciated.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

-- 
Best Regards,
Venkatesan Mahalingam.