[mpls] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-02

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Tue, 29 January 2019 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8449C12D4ED; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:27:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.90.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154876482549.7794.9318023446174567806@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:27:05 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/4xjUUbSLbzVywBkxYux8MzyMBaQ>
Subject: [mpls] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:27:06 -0000

Reviewer: Christian Hopps
Review result: Has Nits

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-02.txt
Reviewer: Christian Hopps
Review Date: 1/29/2019
IETF LC End Date: N/A
Intended Status: Informational

Summary:

Choose from this list...

    This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should
    be considered prior to publication.

Comments:

    The draft quality is high and very readable.

Major Issues:

    No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

    No minor issues found.

Nits:

- Page 3: "ACH" used w/o expansion.
- Page 3: "GAL" used w/o expansion.